The BRAD BLOG Because it's not about Right or Left, it's about Right and Wrong! 2013-06-19T04:27:18Z Copyright 2013 WordPress Brad Friedman <![CDATA[Guest Hosting 'Ed Schultz Show' Tuesday! [AUDIO]]]> http://www.bradblog.com/?p=10079 2013-06-19T03:10:47Z 2013-06-19T03:10:47Z NSA BRAD BLOG Media Appearance War On Terror National Security Rights And Freedoms Photo ID Laws Accountability Barack Obama Voter Registration Democrats Patriot Act U.S. Supreme Court Economy Bush Legacy Ed Schultz Oklahoma I had the pleasure of guest hosting for Ed Schultz today on his radio show.

It was my first time hosting for Big Eddie, after being a guest on his show at various times over many years. We had much fun today in the bargain! My thanks to him and his crew for so generously and helpfully welcoming me aboard. My thanks also to the folks at my radio home base, KPFK/Pacifica Radio in Los Angeles, for helping us pull it all off at very short notice.

I hope you'll have fun as well, listening to the show, if you missed it live today. The entire program is archived below (sans commercials!)

My guests included three great, independent, progressive journalists (four, if you include Desi Doyen, who also joined us, as usual):

  • MARCY WHEELER , from EmptyWheel.net with the latest on today's House Intel Oversight hearing on Edward Snowden's NSA disclosures.
  • ARI BERMAN from The Nation to discuss the this week's Supreme Court rulings on Voting Rights and Voter registration.
  • DAVID DAYEN, formerly of Firedoglake.com on his new, disturbing article in the New Republic on how mortgage service providers are strong-arming the victims of the Moore, OK tornado (and other recent natural disasters).
  • PLUS! A whole bunch of other stuff, a lot of calls, and plenty of thoughts (and occasional rants) on the surveillance state and the politics of it all. As one very generous emailer wrote me after the show: "You cut right through this unfortunate 'where does that leave the President?' talk." --- Well, good! That was my hope!

The audio archives of today's show follow below. Enjoy!

* * *

(Each "Hour" actually 38 mins, now that commercials are removed.)

HOUR 1: I introduce myself to Ed Schultz listeners who may not know me. Much ranting ensues. Then, Ari Berman joins us to discuss SCOTUS and their voting rights rulings, and we fit in a quick call from someone who disagrees with me, kinda, on the NSA matter...
Download MP3 or listen online below...
[See post to listen to audio]

HOUR 2: More NSA, as Marcy Wheeler checks in, followed by lots of phone calls for the rest of the hour!...
Download MP3 or listen online below...
[See post to listen to audio]

HOUR 3: We talk with David Dayen about his disturbing new article; Desi Doyen joins us for some Green News Report; and we shoot it out with more callers...
Download MP3 or listen online below...
[See post to listen to audio]


]]>
Desi Doyen <![CDATA['Green News Report' - June 18, 2013]]> http://www.bradblog.com/?p=10078 2013-06-18T23:11:29Z 2013-06-18T23:11:29Z California Illinois Alaska United Nations Mainstream Media Failure Environment Democrats Republicans Los Angeles Green News Hydraulic fracturing Natural gas Coal Canada Oil Solar Climate change Extreme weather China Keystone XL

 

IN TODAY'S RADIO REPORT: Breaking: L.A. bans single use plastic bags; New study warns 2/3rds of fossil fuel reserves must remain in the ground; Autism risk linked to air pollution - again; Keystone XL pipeline won't use state-of-the-art technology; Alaska hotter than Florida; PLUS: The world's 1st solar plane an antidote to cynicism? ... All that and more in today's Green News Report!

Listen online here, or Download MP3 (6 mins)...

Link:
Embed:

Got comments, tips, love letters, hate mail? Drop us a line at GreenNews@BradBlog.com or right here at the comments link below. All GNRs are always archived at GreenNews.BradBlog.com.

IN 'GREEN NEWS EXTRA' (see links below): Syngenta's dirty tricks campaign to discredit scientists, protect profits; China launches major cap & trade program to cut CO2 emissions; Look out below: Antarctica melting from underneath; Singapore chokes on smoke from deforestation; Many US airports facing threat of sea level rise; Temps in 2300: 'Too hot to live'; Environmental groups delay lawsuit, wait for Obama; NASA: Arctic methane melt at "amazing levels" ... PLUS: VIDEO: Meet the CNBC talking heads dismiss climate science ... and much, MUCH more! ...

STORIES DISCUSSED IN TODAY'S 'GREEN NEWS REPORT'...

'GREEN NEWS EXTRA' (Stuff we didn't have time for in today's audio report)...


  • Skeptical Science: Get the FULL DEBUNKING of ALL Climate Science Denier Arguments
  • Warning: Even in the best-case scenario, climate change will kick our asses (Grist)
  • FOR MORE on Climate Science and Climate Change, go to our Green News Report: Essential Background Page
    ]]> Brad Friedman <![CDATA[3 Bush-Era NSA Whistleblowers: 'Snowden Has Succeeded Where We Failed']]> http://www.bradblog.com/?p=10075 2013-06-18T00:13:11Z 2013-06-18T00:13:11Z (Uncategorized) NSA War On Terror National Security Whistleblowers Barack Obama Bush Legacy Edward Snowden

    I'm prepping to guest host the Ed Schultz Radio Show tomorrow morning (9a-Noon PT, Noon-3p ET), so, for now, I'm gonna leave you with just the request that you go read some of the transcripts and/or videos available at USA Today.

    Over the weekend, they published a conversation with three NSA whistleblowers (and one from DoJ) from during the Bush era. They all laud the latest NSA contractor-turned-whistleblower Edward Snowden for coming forward with his leaks, and say that "he succeeded where we failed" in getting the attention of the public as to what, they say, is going on, and the concerns about secret data gathering operations that the public need to be aware of.

    "They say the documents leaked by Edward Snowden ... proves their claims of sweeping government surveillance of millions of Americans not suspected of any wrongdoing," as USA Today describes the conversation. "They say those revelations only hint at the programs' reach."

    Please go to the page and read some of the transcripts and/or watch the video conversation, which I don't have time to highlight at the moment: "3 NSA veterans speak out on whistle-blower: We told you so".

    Here is just the very beginning of the conversation...

    Q: Did Edward Snowden do the right thing in going public?

    William Binney: We tried to stay for the better part of seven years inside the government trying to get the government to recognize the unconstitutional, illegal activity that they were doing and openly admit that and devise certain ways that would be constitutionally and legally acceptable to achieve the ends they were really after. And that just failed totally because no one in Congress or — we couldn't get anybody in the courts, and certainly the Department of Justice and inspector general's office didn't pay any attention to it. And all of the efforts we made just produced no change whatsoever. All it did was continue to get worse and expand.

    Q: So Snowden did the right thing?

    Binney: Yes, I think he did.

    Q: You three wouldn't criticize him for going public from the start?

    J. Kirk Wiebe: Correct.

    Binney: In fact, I think he saw and read about what our experience was, and that was part of his decision-making.

    Wiebe: We failed, yes.

    Jesselyn Radack: Not only did they go through multiple and all the proper internal channels and they failed, but more than that, it was turned against them. ... The inspector general was the one who gave their names to the Justice Department for criminal prosecution under the Espionage Act. And they were all targets of a federal criminal investigation, and Tom ended up being prosecuted — and it was for blowing the whistle.

    Also related and of note, from Thomas Drake, one of the whistleblowers included in the USA Today conversation above --- his column from last week: "Snowden saw what I saw: surveillance criminally subverting the constitution."


    ]]>
    Ernest A. Canning <![CDATA[U.S. Supreme Court Strikes Down Arizona Proof of Citizenship Voter Registration Requirement]]> http://www.bradblog.com/?p=10074 2013-06-17T21:15:33Z 2013-06-17T21:15:33Z Florida Arizona Rights And Freedoms U.S. Constitution EAC Louisiana Barack Obama Voter Registration Republicans U.S. Supreme Court Antonin Scalia Rick Scott NVRA In a ruling hailed by voting rights advocates today, Arizona's requirement that newly registered voters submit proof of citizenship with their registration has been struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court in a 7-2 decision. Justice Antonin Scalia authored the opinion for the majority, while Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented.

    The court rejected provisions of Proposition 200, a ballot measure approved by AZ voters in 2004, which mandated that state election officials reject all applications to register to vote that did not include documentary proof of citizenship. Those documents, however, are not currently required by the Federal Form for voter registration, as approved by the Elections Assistance Commission (EAC) pursuant to provisions of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA).

    Today's ruling in Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona [PDF], is grounded upon the plenary power given to Congress by the Elections Clause (Art. I §4 of the U.S. Constitution) empowering Congress to preempt state regulations governing the "Times, Places and Manner" of holding federal elections. The court found that the NVRA mandate that states "accept and use" the Federal Form for voter registration takes precedence, and that Prop 200 is invalid because it conflicts with the Congressional intent that the NVRA help ease the ability of citizens to register to vote.

    Writing for the majority, Justice Scalia observed that if a state could "demand of Federal Form applicants every additional piece of information the State requires…the Federal Form ceases to perform any meaningful function, and would be a feeble means of 'increas[ing] the number of eligible citizens who register to vote in elections for Federal office.'"

    This does not close the door on the issue altogether, however. Justice Scalia noted that, pursuant to the NVRA, any state can ask that "the EAC alter the Federal Form to include information the State deems necessary to determine eligibility." If the EAC then rejects such a request, the state "may challenge the EAC's rejection of that request [in court]"...

    As AP's Jesse Holland reported, although Louisiana followed such a course by obtaining EAC approval of that state's requirements for additional documentation to be attached to the Federal Form, the availability of that option has been complicated by the fact that, currently, there are no EAC Commissioners --- apparently, as observed by U.C. Irvine Law Prof. Rick Hasen, because "influential Republicans" are of "the view that the EAC is a failed experiment and nothing should be done to revive it."

    In fact, while the President put forward nominations for the two Democratic slots on the four person commission, Republicans have failed to either nominate their own two candidates, or allow for confirmation hearings on the Democratic nominees. This stalemate has persisted, at this point, for years.

    As can be expected, there have been competing reactions to this new decision.

    At one end of the spectrum is, as noted in the above-cited AP report, Chapman Univ. Law Professor, Tom Caso, who complained that the Court's decision has "opened the door" to non-citizen voting --- this, despite Justice Scalia's assurance that the NVRA (and, therefore, this Supreme Court decision) "does not preclude States from 'deny[ing] registration based on information in their possession establishing the applicant's ineligibility.'"

    At the other end, one finds the statement of Sherrilyn Ifill, President and Director-Counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, proclaiming that the Court's decision in this case "protects the more than 30,000 individuals whose registration applications were rejected following the passage of Proposition 200, nearly 17 percent of whom were Latinos."

    Writing for The Nation and citing a brief by the Mexican American Legal Defense Fund (MALDEF) [PDF] last March, Ari Berman reports that "The law has needlessly prevented eligible voters from registering and has made voter registration work more difficult. 'The proportion of all voter registrations in [Phoenix's] Maricopa County attributable to community-based drives decreased from 24% in 2004 to 7% in 2005, 5% in 2006 and 6% in 2007,' found MALDEF."

    Hailing today's ruling, the NAACP not only pointed to the fact that the case was originally filed by "Jesus Gonzalez, a naturalized U.S. citizen who was rejected for registration under Arizona Proposition 200," but noted that the state failed "to identify a single instance" in which a non-citizen voted.

    This is in line with The BRAD BLOG's previous investigations with respect to a recent attempted voter purge of suspected "non-citizen" voters from Florida's eligible voter rolls. As a result of a months long investigation, The BRAD BLOG was able to verify only nine (9) non-citizens on the rolls out of some 182,000 voters who had been the targets of a reckless and dishonest purge that had been concocted by the Sunshine state's Republican Governor, Rick Scott, and by his hand-picked, Republican Secretary of State Scott Detzner.

    As with polling place Photo ID laws, regulations like those contained in the now invalidated Arizona Proposition 200 are far more likely to prevent perfectly legal citizens from exercising their right to vote than to prevent illicit votes from non-eligible voters.

    AP also notes, today's "decision on voter registration has broader implications because other states have similar requirements, such as Alabama, Georgia, Kansas and Tennessee, and still others are contemplating such legislation."

    Voting Rights advocates and SCOTUS watchers are still awaiting the court's ruling, which could come as early as this Thursday, on a case with even farther reaching aspects. The court may strike down Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 in that upcoming decision. That Section of the long-standing federal law requires that certain jurisdictions with a long history of racial discrimination receive preclearance from the federal government before instituting new election-related laws. Section 5 was invoked this year to block discriminatory polling place Photo ID restrictions laws in states such as South Carolina and Texas. Without Section 5, voting rights advocates fear, it will be much more difficult to block voter suppression efforts until after the damage from such laws has already been done.

    Ironically, because of its past history of discrimination, Arizona became a "covered jurisdiction" under the VRA in 1975. In 2005, the same AZ Proposition 200, which the Supreme Court struck down today, was pre-cleared under Section 5 by the George W. Bush/Alberto Gonzales Justice Department

    * * *
    Ernest A. Canning has been an active member of the California state bar since 1977. Mr. Canning has received both undergraduate and graduate degrees in political science as well as a juris doctor. He is also a Vietnam vet (4th Infantry, Central Highlands 1968). Follow him on Twitter: @Cann4ing.


    ]]>
    Ernest A. Canning <![CDATA[Greenwald Responds to False Claims, Threat of Arrest by Republican Congressman [VIDEO]]]> http://www.bradblog.com/?p=10068 2013-06-15T14:35:32Z 2013-06-15T14:35:32Z Fox 'News' CNN NSA War On Terror Whistleblowers Rights And Freedoms U.S. Constitution Journalist Intimidation Accountability U.S. House Republicans Peter King WikiLeaks Julian Assange Edward Snowden Anderson Cooper Glenn Greenwald Earlier this week, CNN's Anderson Cooper interviewed The Guardian's Glenn Greenwald about the baseless claim made by Rep. Peter King (R-NY), on Fox "News", that Greenwald was "threatening to disclose" the identities of covert American CIA operatives.

    Additionally, and in flagrant disregard for the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment, King had earlier disgraced himself by calling for the arrest of journalist Greenwald, who originally broke the news on a number of the disclosures made by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden. (The additional irony here, of course, is that King himself actually is an avowed supporter of terrorism.)

    Cooper and Greenwald then discussed the claim that American national security has been harmed by the disclosures made by Snowden, and why both citizens and journalists should never merely accept, at face value, such claims from public officials...

    ANDERSON COOPER: King also says that you should be prosecuted because of what you've already published, saying it puts American lives at risk…When Wikileaks released huge amounts of information…a lot of people said, you know, "They had blood on their hands. Julian Assange has had blood on his hands." But then U.S. officials privately admitted to people in Congress and even publicly that even though the revelations were embarrassing, were a problem, that they couldn’t name anyone who really had lost their lives because of it. So now, when people are saying that you have put American lives at risk, do you believe that at all?

    GLENN GREENWALD: No. And Anderson, that point that you just made, in my opinion, is really the crucial point, for anybody listening, to take away. Every single time the American government has things that they’ve done in secret exposed or revealed to the world and they're embarrassed by it, the tactic that they use is to try and scare people into believing that they have to overlook what they have done --- they have to trust American officials to exercise power in the dark, lest they be attacked; that their security and safety depend upon placing this value in political officials. And I really think it’s the supreme obligation of every journalist and every citizen when they hear an American official say --- 'this story about us jeopardizes national security' --- to demand specifics; to ask, what exactly it is that has jeopardized national security.

    King's blatant lies about Greenwald ought to underscore his point that such officials are not to be merely trusted.

    Video of Anderson Cooper's 6/12/2013 interview of Glenn Greenwald follows below...


    ]]>
    Brad Friedman <![CDATA[Biden (2006) v. Obama (2013): The Surveillance State 'Debate' Continues [VIDEO]]]> http://www.bradblog.com/?p=10072 2013-06-15T00:07:00Z 2013-06-15T00:07:00Z (Uncategorized) Fox 'News' NSA War On Terror National Security Rights And Freedoms U.S. Constitution Accountability Barack Obama Joe Biden Bush Legacy Edward Snowden There's a reason I argued we are now living on Planet Partisan the other day. In what is now, apparently, our continuing series on partisans attempting to justify their all-new positions on the massive, secret, US national security surveillance state by completely ignoring and/or reversing their very strong previously held positions, we first had...

    And now we have this...


    ]]>
    Brad Friedman <![CDATA[My Appearance on 'The Ed Schultz Show': On Snowden, Obama and the Democrats' Dilemma]]> http://www.bradblog.com/?p=10071 2013-06-14T18:09:44Z 2013-06-14T18:09:44Z NSA BRAD BLOG Media Appearance Barack Obama Democrats Republicans Bush Legacy Ed Schultz Edward Snowden I did a quick hit on Ed Schultz' radio show, which is always fun, on Thursday. The audio is posted below.

    Ed seems to be somewhat conflicted on what to make of the Edward Snowden issue. I tried to help unconflict him a bit...

    Download MP3 or listen online below [Appx 12 mins]...
    [See post to listen to audio]


    ]]>
    Desi Doyen <![CDATA['Green News Report' - June 13, 2013]]> http://www.bradblog.com/?p=10069 2013-06-13T22:55:27Z 2013-06-13T22:55:27Z Colorado Texas New York New Mexico Wyoming Louisiana Environment Republicans U.S. Supreme Court Michael Bloomberg Green News Hydraulic fracturing Natural gas Coal Canada 'Tea Party' Ecuador Oil Climate change Extreme weather Oklahoma Hurricane Sandy Keystone XL

     

    IN TODAY'S RADIO REPORT: CO wildfire now most destructive in state history; Another chemical plant explodes, this time in LA; Supreme Court rules on TX v. OK water war; New oil spills in Brazil and Canada; PLUS: Mayor Bloomberg's $20B Sandy recovery and climate change plan for NYC ... All that and more in today's Green News Report!

    Listen online here, or Download MP3 (6 mins)...

    Link:
    Embed:

    Got comments, tips, love letters, hate mail? Drop us a line at GreenNews@BradBlog.com or right here at the comments link below. All GNRs are always archived at GreenNews.BradBlog.com.

    IN 'GREEN NEWS EXTRA' (see links below): Methane leaks could negate climate benefits of nat gas boom; Too hot to live: grim long-term prediction; Will coastal cities follow NYC's climate lead?; 1970s pollution led to African drought; Tea Party takes on utility over lack of solar energy; 'Understory' fires burning in drier Amazon rainforest; White House delays environmental, energy rules... PLUS: NASA Finds ‘Amazing’ Levels Of Arctic Methane And CO2, Asks ‘Is a Sleeping Climate Giant Stirring in the Arctic?’ ... and much, MUCH more! ...

    STORIES DISCUSSED IN TODAY'S 'GREEN NEWS REPORT'...

    'GREEN NEWS EXTRA' (Stuff we didn't have time for in today's audio report)...


  • Skeptical Science: Get the FULL DEBUNKING of ALL Climate Science Denier Arguments
  • Warning: Even in the best-case scenario, climate change will kick our asses (Grist)
  • FOR MORE on Climate Science and Climate Change, go to our Green News Report: Essential Background Page
    ]]> Brad Friedman <![CDATA['We're in the Abyss': My KPFK 'BradCast' Intvw with Daniel Ellsberg on Edward Snowden]]> http://www.bradblog.com/?p=10067 2013-06-13T18:34:04Z 2013-06-13T18:34:04Z BRAD BLOG NSA BRAD BLOG Media Appearance Whistleblowers Rights And Freedoms U.S. Constitution Journalist Intimidation Mainstream Media Failure Accountability Barack Obama Patriot Act Daniel Ellsberg Richard Nixon Bush Legacy KPFK Edward Snowden

    In his column over the weekend, lauding the "conscience and patriotism" of NSA contractor-turned-whistleblower Edward Snowden, legendary "Pentagon Papers" whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg cited a 1975 warning about the NSA from Sen. Frank Church (D-ID), chairman of the U.S. Senate Select Committee tasked with investigating unlawful intelligence gathering by the NSA, CIA and FBI following the Watergate scandal.

    "I know the capacity that is there to make tyranny total in America," Church said, "and we must see to it that this agency and all agencies that possess this technology operate within the law and under proper supervision, so that we never cross over that abyss. That is the abyss from which there is no return."

    On Wednesday, during a fascinating interview on The BradCast on KPFK/Pacifica Radio, Ellsberg said directly, in the wake of Snowden's disclosures: "We're in the abyss. What he feared has come to pass."

    The Guardian has asserted that former NSA contractor Edward Snowden "will go down in history as one of America's most consequential whistleblowers alongside Daniel Ellsberg and Bradley Manning," do it seemed the perfect time to chat with Ellsberg about all of this.

    He offered a number of thoughts about Snowden himself, from one of the few people in the world who may have real insight into what the 29-year old leaker must be thinking and dealing with right about now, and why he may have chosen to both leave the country and then come out publicly. He describes Snowden as "a patriotic American, and to call him a traitor reveals a real misunderstanding of our founding documents."

    "What he has revealed, of course, is documentary evidence of a broadly, blatantly unconstitutional program here which negates the Fourth Amendment," Ellsberg said. "And if it continues in this way, I think it makes democracy essentially impossible or meaningless."

    As usual, Ellsberg pulled no punches in his comments on the dangers of our privatized surveillance state; the failure of our Congressional intelligence oversight committees (which he describes as "fraudulent" and "totally broken"); and on those who have been critical of Snowden and of Glenn Greenwald, the journalist from The Guardian who has broken most of the scoops on Snowden's leaked documents.

    He said that folks like attorney Jeffrey Toobin at the New Yorker and author Thomas Friedman at New York Times and Senator Dianne Feinstein "are being very strongly discredited," by their attacks on Snowden. "The criticisms they're making, I think, are very discreditable to them in their profession," he says.

    And, while answering to my request for a response to Josh Marshall's recent piece at TPM, in which Marshall weights his own conscience on this matter and frankly revealing his natural tendency to support the government over whistleblowers in cases like this, Ellsberg was particularly pointed. "Marshall has a lot to be said for him as a blogger," he said, before adding: "I think what he said there is stupid and mistaken and does not do him credit." He went on to describe some of Marshall's comments as "slander" against Snowden.

    One other point that merits highlight here for now, before I let ya listen below. The difference between Ellsberg's circumstances and those in play today.

    Ellsberg noted that after leaking top secret Defense Department documents to the New York Times in 1971, detailing how the Johnson Administration had lied the nation into the Vietnam War, President Nixon, at the time, ordered a break-in of his psychiatrist's office and discussed having Ellsberg "eliminated".

    "All the things that were done to me then," he noted chillingly, "including a CIA profile on me, a burglary of my former psychiatrist's office in order to get information to blackmail me with, all of those things were illegal, as one might think that they ought to be."

    "They're legal now, since 9/11, with the PATRIOT Act, which on that very basis alone should be repealed. In other words, this is a case right now with Snowden that shows very dramatically the dangers of that PATRIOT Act, used as it is. So the fact is, that all these things are legal. And even the one of possibly eliminating him"...

    "We're In the abyss," indeed...

    Download MP3 or listen online below...
    [See post to listen to audio]

    * * *

    UPDATE: Complete text transcript of interview now here. [Courtesy Emily Levy]


    ]]>
    Brad Friedman <![CDATA[Hannity (Dubya Era) vs. Hannity (Obama Era): Surveillance State Hypocrisy Champion [VIDEO]]]> http://www.bradblog.com/?p=10066 2013-06-13T03:22:16Z 2013-06-13T03:22:16Z Fox 'News' NSA Sean Hannity War On Terror National Security Rights And Freedoms U.S. Constitution Mainstream Media Failure Accountability Several days ago, I posted a video showing the stark differences between the positions on massive surveillance programs by candidate Barack Obama in 2007 and President Barack Obama in 2013.

    And now, since we're nothing if not "fair and balanced", here is a short video of Sean Hannity of Fox "News" repeatedly lauding massive NSA surveillance programs during the George W. Bush Administration...and then decrying the very same programs as "tyranny" and a blatant violation of the U.S. Constitution now that Obama is doing it.

    With all due respect to Hannity --- and I have none --- his over the top hypocrisy then versus now trumps even Obama's, hands down. Not to mention the small detail that the programs, as carried out under Bush were, at the time, illegal, while under Obama they have been made "legal". (Or so we are told. There is so much secrecy around them, of course, it is virtually impossible for the public to know either way.) Enjoy!...

    Also recently related: "Republicans Suddenly Decide to Care About Big Government Overreach"


    ]]>