Guest blogged by David Edwards
President Jimmy Carter appeared on the NBC’s Today Show this morning to promote his new book Our Endangered Values.
President Carter spoke about several of the many scandals that the Republicans and Bush White House are now facing. In particular, Carter holds strong views against torture, the outing of Valerie Plame and the misused intelligence and lies prior to the invasion of Iraq.
Video in Windows Media format…
Video QuickTime format…
UPDATE: Transcript added below…
PRESIDENT JIMMY CARTER: Good morning, it’s good to be with you.
LAUER: Let me ask you about David’s piece there. Do youthink the nomination of Samuel Alito by President Bush to the Supreme Court, isa deliberate attempt to pick a fight with the Democrats and shift attentionaway from some other problems?
PRESIDENT CARTER: I don’t think it’s deliberate, I think he had toappoint another nominee and so it was inevitable that he would do it. Thismight be a propicious time to bring it to the forefront, but I think the newsthis morning, about torture around the world by Americans, is going to take alot of the news as well.
LAUER: Well the report as I read it this morning, doesn’tactually say torture is going on, but it does say there are some secret prisonsbeing set up around the world. I was looking at your face as that report wasairing, trying to see if there was any sense of shock on your face. Are yousurprised by the report?
PRESIDENT CARTER: No, in the last five years there has been a profoundand radical change in the basic policies, or moral values, of our country. This is just one indication of what has been done under this administration tochange the policies that have persisted all the way through our history,including the policies of George Bush, Sr., of Gerald Ford, of Ronald Reagan, ofDwight Eisenhower, as well as Democratic Presidents. And the insistence, byour government, that the CIA or others have the right to torture prisoners, inGuantanamo and around the world is just one indication of what thisadministration has done that’s a radical departure from past policies.
LAUER: If you, though, were President today facing this samewar on terrorism that President Bush is now waging and the threat of Al-Qaeda,would you not see it necessary to take certain steps to combat that enemy, thatmight seem outside the box and the legal, or maybe even moral box?
PRESIDENT CARTER: No, this is an International agreement, to whichevery nation has suscribed, called the Geneva Accord, where every countrypledges not to torture prisoners taken in time of war. My own uncle was aprisoner, as I mentioned in my book, and he was tortured by the Japanese. Soafter the II World War, this was imposed voluntarily on all nations. So everyPresident that we’ve had since then, has agreed we won’t torture prisoners andwe expect the rest of the world not to torture our prisoners. But this is justone example of our nation’s abandonment of the basic moral values that havemade our country great. It’s not just a Republican vs. Democrat, or a Liberalvs. Conservative, it’s a basic change in the values of our country.
LAUER: Let me ask you about this CIA leak investigation. There are two different schools of thought here. One school says that aftertwo years of an investigation, the Special Prosecutor showed no deliberateconspiracy in an attempt to out a CIA officer. The other school of thought is,the indictment of Scooter Libby shows that top administration officials cannotbe trusted to tell the truth. Where do you come down?
PRESIDENT CARTER: Well, I think that what the Democrats did yesterdayis going to be very helpful, to require an investigation of why we went to war,which I think was completely unnecessary, an unjust war, and how much did wedeliberately, or inadvertently, distort the available intelligence to try tomislead the American people into going to war and I think that…
LAUER: Not to interrupt, but do you think though theRepublican leadership, especially in the Senate Intelligence Committee, hasdragged it’s feet?
PRESIDENT CARTER: There’s no doubt about it.
LAUER: To protect the administration?
PRESIDENT CARTER: Well certainly. I don’t think there’s any doubtabout that and I believe that was proven yesterday in the closed session,because even Republicans agreed, okay now we will at least move forward and I …
LAUER: But they said they had agreed to that anyway.
PRESIDENT CARTER: But they agreed about 18 months ago and hadn’t done adarn thing. So I think now, they’re going to have to do something.
LAUER: In your book, you say, you criticize the decision togo to war in Iraq for several reasons, including what you refer to as militaryaction taken “based on erroneous, or deliberately distorted, intelligence”.
PRESIDENT CARTER: Exactly.
LAUER: Those are very different things. We all know theintelligence was erroneous. Have you seen any proof that says it wasdeliberately manipulated to make a case for war?
PRESIDENT CARTER: Well I haven’t seen proof yet, I think that’s what’sgoing to come out, but there’s all kinds of allegations which have not beendenied, that the British and American leaders agreed, far in advance even ofthe attack, that we would go to war against Iraq. And I don’t think there’sany doubt, based on the public writings of the Vice President and others, evenbefore George W. Bush was elected. We’re going to go to war against Iraq, because George Bush, Sr., should have removed Saddam Hussein from power. And so itwasn’t 9/11 that precipitated the attack, this was a culmination of a long termplan, we’re going to attack Iraq and then we’re going to establish an Americanmilitary base of a major character in the Middle East, in Iraq, and still in the process remove Saddam Hussein. I think that the claims that Saddamwas involved in 9/11 and the claims that they had massive weapons of massdestruction that would threaten our country were manipulated at least, tomislead the American people into going to war.
LAUER: Not a lot of time left and a tough question to endon, but in the darkest times of your administration, 1979, you talked to theAmerican people and you said there’s a crisis of confidence here and you askedyour cabinet basically to resign. Do you think there is a similar crisis ofconfidence with this administration and if you were advising President Bush,and he probably wouldn’t listen, but if you were, how would you recommend thathe fix it.
PRESIDENT CARTER: I think tell the American people the truth, would beone major start, about what happened during, to bring the country into war. Ithink another thing is to abandon the radical policies concerning going towar. We now say we’re not going to wait until our country’s security’s indanger, we’re going to have preemptive war, we’re going to go to war ahead oftime, because of our massive military might. The abandonment of basic humanrights, the derrigation of American civil liberties and personal privacy, the vastrewarding in the time of war, of extremely rich Americans at the expense ofworking class people, the abandonment of protecting the American environment –all of these things are massive and radical departures from what our countryhas seen under every President in the last hundred or more years in ourcountry. It’s not just Republicans vs. Democrats, it’s this administration vs.every administration that has preceded it.
LAUER: Quite a laundry list and it’s the things you writeabout in your book, called “Our Endangered Values”. President Carter, thank’sso much, nice to have you here.
PRESIDENT CARTER: It’s good to be here, Matt, thank you.









.
.
.
Anyone notice that during the entire interview when Carter was saying that "this wasn’t about the left or right", the tagline underneath his name was:
"ARE WE MORE DIVIDED THAN EVER?"
.
.
.
I watched him on Larry King Live.
I was impressed with his presentation.
Jimmy Carter comes as close to a non-partisan public figure as anyone in public life. Problem is, his presidency has been used for target practice by Republicans since 1980. in the same way Democrats were still running against Herbert Hoover in the 1960s.
Our political system is so corrupt, non-partisanship has become an "unreachable star." When President Carter called James Baker "my favorite Republican," he got no credit from Republicans for non-partisanship; instead, they presented the phony Baker/Carter commission as election reform.
When he said, "There’s no doubt Al Gore won the 2000 election," his comment was derided by Republicans as partisan, and ignored by the mainstream media.
A viable third party has never been more urgently needed. I propose a Good Government Party, a fusion coalition of Greens, Libertarians, Independents, and disgruntled former Democrats and Republicans. Could it win? Sure…Bush is at 35% approval, and Congress is even lower.
The problem would be money (Corporate America would pour out its treasuries to fight a third party), and media legitimacy (the mainstream media are part of Corporate America, after all). But Ross Perot got 19% of the vote in 1992, running against an incumbent (Bush, Sr.) whose approval rating never got close to 35%…and he did it without any help from corporations and in spite of ridicule by the press and television.
I’ve always liked Carter, and this interview just reconfirms why . I too am impressed !
Carter was great! I saw him on "Hardball" as well and he appears to know about PNAC and all the lies with Iraq. Having President Carter and Clinton around make me so proud to be a democrat and a religious Christian. Carter puts all these rightwing jerks like Dobson, Falwell etc. to shame. His book is now on my "to buy" list.
Jimmy Carter is a fine human being, no question. My only reservation about him is how he allows himself to be used by Republicans.
Reagan sent him to the Philippines to check on the latest Marcos election (the one in which Marcos got all 10,000 votes in one district and explained away by saying, "I have a lot of cousins out there"). Instead of praising Carter for revealing what a snake Marcos was, he praised Marcos as "a wonderful friend of America." At the next election, the G.O.P. ran against Carter again.
Now he shares a podium with a snake of a different color, James A. Baker, III. The Republicans and Robert Pastor (not my pastor) call this "bi-partisan election reform"…except they focus not on election fraud, but voter fraud (the tiny percentage of people who vote twice, or vote without being registered). And he calls Baker "my favorite Republican."
Jimmy Carter is really too nice to be in politics at this point. In fact, he was too nice 25 years ago.
I’m so glad to see these nice comments about Carter. I’m with you folks — Carter got smeared by the same media machine we have today. He is just too nice.
We really need a no-nonsense outspoken political candidate — someone who won’t let the pukes get away with their crap by being just too nice to them. They don’t deserve any more "Mr. Nice Guy" and it’s WRONG to keep giving them any more leeway.
I particularly like Paul Hackett … but even he grew quiet after Jean Schmidt was awarded the election by the GoPees.
Here’s a post from July (from AMERICAblog) that is VERY interesting considering all the other neoCON Alzheimer Patients we have holding official US Government positions, who can’t seem to remember anything — incriminating — that is.
Sunday, July 31, 2005
GOP US House candidate in Ohio caught hiding ties to CoinGate scandalmonger Tom Noe
by John in DC – 7/31/2005 01:19:00 PM
Jean Schmidt, the GOP candidate for the open US House seat in Ohio, being voted on this tuesday, apparently lied about her ties to CoinGate-man Tom Noe.
Schmidt told a local news show this morning that she didn’t know Tom Noe, never met him, and never even HEARD of him. Funny, because she testified before Noe only three years ago, and Schmidt apparently has almost total recall of everyone she’s ever met. Guess when those multi-million dollar scandals kick in, that total recall starts to get a bit fuzzy. Maybe she’ll start parsing the definition "met."
So — the well-rehearsed "I never met insert name here."
How many times do they get to say this before people make the connection that they’re LYING?
"Why of course the people don’t want war… That is understood. But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship …Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger."
Hermann Goering