Everything’s fine. Nothing to worry about. These aren’t the droids you’re looking for. That was the message out of Sacramento yesterday in regards to the newly exposed concerns about ES&S voting machines in California as recently revealed by a secret letter from California’s Secretary of State. That letter was written and sent five weeks ago privately, but only reported publicly for the first time last week after it was uncovered by an AP reporter.
Of course, CA SoS Bruce McPherson’s office has yet to actually inform the voters (you remember them, don’t you, Mr. McPherson?) of the “problems experienced by counties utilitizing ES&S voting equipment and software” as discovered during the recent November Special Election which “deeply concerned” the SoS enough to threaten ES&S with decertification in the entire state, according to the letter.
But the message out yesterday is that all is well, and no — you pesky voters don’t need to worry your pretty little selves about a thing!
According to the Vallejo Times-Herald (note how the concern in the lede here is for Elections Officials as opposed to Voters!):
If the state had gone forward with its threat to decertify the Election Systems and Software used in Solano and in 10 other California counties, it likely would have meant Solano would have to replace its voting machines for the second time in nearly two years.
Yea! The Solano County leaders don’t have to worry about a thing! Merry Christmas, Bedford Falls!
Specifically, in a letter obtained by The Associated Press, Assistant Secretary of State for Elections Bradley J. Clark warned he’d start the process of decertifying ES&S machines for use in California if senior officials didn’t address concerns with vote counts and verification, problems that surfaced during the state’s Nov. 8 special election. The concerns needed to be dealt with immediately, the letter said.
“They’ve thoroughly met our needs,” Secretary of State spokeswoman Jennifer Kerns said Tuesday, adding that the company addressed the concerns “one by one.”
What exactly are those needs, Ms. Kerns? Do the California Voters have any right to know about them? Or will it require investigative reporters and bloggers with bad attitudes to uncover still more secret letters and documents sent to the Voting Machine Companies that we, the Voters (you remember us, don’t you, Ms. Kern?), are paying with our tax-dollars to privatize our public elections?!
State Senator Debra Bowen had previously called on you “to immediately release all corrspondence to all vendors, and all documentation related to the certification of any and all voting equipment and voting systems.” Have the SoS’s office done so? It would certainly be appreciated, so we could judge for ourselves about those “one by one” needs that ES&S has “thoroughly met”. And we speak as California Voters ourselves here, by the way.
Bowen also asked, “When is the public entitled to know?” Which, of course, we’d like to know as well. She also added “This kind of secrecy is completely unacceptable.” And, of course, we agree to that as well.
So, Mr. McPherson or Ms. Kerns — or whoever it is that is making decisions up there in Sacramento while you suppose that few are paying attention between Christmas and New Years — would you like to answer the Senator’s call on behalf of the voters of California for whom you work?
Our lines are always open. We’ll be happy to help you disseminate all of that information. If you actually care about such things. We’ll even try and get rid of the bad attitude when we do just for fairness sake. But you’ll have to meet us halfway. If you work for us (as you’re supposed to), then we’ll do our best to work with you.
(Hat tip to the eagle-eyed John Gideon, who, unlike Diebold, actually means it when he says he “never rests”.)
We need Debra Bowen’s help for this one. That reminds me, she’s looking for financial help for her campaign.
Thanks for pointing it out, Robert! As a matter of fact, I understand she has a 12/31 filing deadline for various monies.
So now’s a great time to throw her a few sheckels to support her run for California SoS!
I don’t know, is it just me who feels that these SoS’ of the states that originally questioned the Diebold and ES&S, etc. machines, the ones who suddenly changed their minds about how wonderful they REALLY are after all…Does the word BRIBERY come to anyone else’s mind? Maybe I’m just paranoid, although I can’t understand why I would have ANYTHING to be paranoid about these days….
We have been after answers now for some time out here in Ca. All we can get is a stonewall. Maybe it will take some more pressure. Maybe we need to start putting these wingnuts in jail. Do you supose that would help?
Perhaps we need a national campaign to get all democrats to vote by absentee ballot. If this could be accomplished, it would create a paper trail of all democratic votes, prevent the effectiveness election day challenges of eligibility, sidestep the practice of setting up too few poling stations in heavily democratic districts, and using the state patrol, JEB, to intimidate minority voters. It would also give the SoS’s fits. Just a thought.
Dave,
I’ve been voting absentee for the last several years – ever since they opened it up to anyone – used to be you needed an excuse.
It is for that very reason – paper!
Last Nov I opened my absentee ballot and promptly marked the first item – WRONG.
Had to take the ballot to the polling place where they marked it spoiled and placed it in a bag also marked spoiled.
I was then given another ballot which I filled out. It was placed into a box which for all the world looked like a paper shredder. An LCD readout on top of the box showed my ballot was #347. I was then given a sticker that said I had voted.
There also was an item in the room with an LED display similar to a computer monitor which had the ESS banner on the screen. I did not see it used – I guess maybe it was a tabulator.
I went home feeling confident that my vote was counted – NOT!
Mr. Gideon,
Mr. March,
We need your expertise in these matters ASAP…..when ES&S says it is "secure and will take care of the problems", we know that means the exact opposite of what they are telling the world!!!!!
Lets get another hacker test on these machines…..this time on the ES&S tabulator, machines..the only thing which matters. You can still vote absentee and your vote will never count- not when a tabulator with a free hackers backdoor is used 24/7, 7 days a week.
Doug E.
As a Solano resident I have followed this since the touch screens were here.
What I want to know is WHY were recounts not done in the counties in question AUTOMATICALLY??
I was told as I put my ballot into the machine that in the event the maching is off, they would go to the paper ballots and recount.
Was this done??
I have emailed my local election board for years. They have NEVER once responded to any of my questions.