READER COMMENTS ON
"'Daily Voting News' For June 29, 2006"
(6 Responses so far...)
COMMENT #1 [Permalink]
not my president
said on 6/29/2006 @ 7:06 pm PT...
COMMENT #2 [Permalink]
said on 6/30/2006 @ 1:14 am PT...
Paper ballots would be nice but the electronic voting machines gives these guys the "high tech" Sharper Image store feel they crave to keep up with the Joneses in other states
COMMENT #3 [Permalink]
said on 6/30/2006 @ 4:27 am PT...
Well, random audits are the best thing I've heard yet as far as verifying anything, but considering they left the paper trail out of the laws governing a recount, does that mean they will have to change the law?
Are we going to have some public debate this time involving some of that good old "noisy democracy" involving some of the local computer professionals, or require the local media to ignore the process again and cast doubt on it.
Can we please have an open and honest debate about this that everybody feels comfortable with and agrees on! That should be easy to do!
Time is running out, and we have to start now.
COMMENT #4 [Permalink]
said on 6/30/2006 @ 4:29 am PT...
Can Bruce Funk have his job back!
COMMENT #5 [Permalink]
said on 6/30/2006 @ 5:23 am PT...
One congressional district was found to be illegal under the Voting Rights Act.
The Supreme Court said it was gerrymandered by DeLay's forces to neutralize minority citizens:
(LULAC v Perry).
COMMENT #6 [Permalink]
Robert Lockwood Mills
said on 6/30/2006 @ 5:31 am PT...
I guess this means that the media will deal with election fraud only after Britney has her baby.
Hope it's born early.