By John Gideon on 2/20/2007, 4:23pm PT  

Guest Blogged by John Gideon of VotersUnite.org

USAToday reports, “A study by the Eagleton Institute of Politics at Rutgers University shows turnout in 2004 was about 4% lower in states that required voters to sign their name or produce documentation. Hispanic turnout was 10% lower; the difference was about 6% for blacks and Asian-Americans.” And what do we hear from the Election Assistance Commission that, last year, buried a report that found there was very little evidence of voter fraud, the very reason some say they need voter ID laws? The commission's chairwoman, Donetta Davidson, called the study "premature." More work needs to be done, she said. "You can't make determinations based on one year," she said. "We have new states that have ID requirements now that weren't in that review."” If Davidson can’t bury the truth it appears she will deny it exists....

  • NAtional: Study: Stricter voting ID rules hurt '04 turnout LINK
  • NAtional: Editorial - Needed: Voting machine integrity LINK
  • NAtional: Can we work "within the system"? A response to those who think we can. LINK
  • NAtional: Voting Machines as a Giant Ponzi Scheme LINK
  • NAtional: Feinstein seeks GAO investigation of e-voting machines
    Senator calls for a study of DRE machines for possible fraud, mechanical miscues LINK
  • NAtional: The False Dichotomies Being Used by Democrats and Their Public-Advocacy Group Supporters to Prop Up the Failings of the Holt Election Reform Bill LINK
  • CA: All Mail Elections In California? LINK
  • NY: Special Election Day Uses Same Old Voting LINK
  • TX: Fort Bend County Voters Could Be Using Paper Ballots By Next Year LINK
  • UT: Funding for an early Utah primary gets some support LINK
  • UT: Lawmakers want state to have a say LINK
  • WV: Provide ‘Paper Trails’ For Voting Machines LINK
  • **"Daily Voting News" is meant as a comprehensive listing of reports each day concerning issues related to election and voting news around the country regardless of quality or political slant. Therefore, items listed in "Daily Voting News" may not reflect the opinions of VotersUnite.Org or BradBlog.Com**