12 Responses

1. 

   1)

   Marc said on 6/8/2007 @ 3:49pm PT: [Permalink]

   Hi – this is a test comment.

2. 

   2)

   Brad Friedman said on 6/8/2007 @ 3:49pm PT: [Permalink]

   Test comment. Ignore this. Folks seem to be having trouble commenting today, so I’m trying to figure out why.

3. 

   3)

   greggp said on 6/8/2007 @ 3:56pm PT: [Permalink]

   I really hope that Chairman Conyers will subpoena Craig Donsanto to testify as to whether he told Schlozman it was o.k. to prosecute before the election.

4. 

   4)

   Brad said on 6/8/2007 @ 3:57pm PT: [Permalink]

   testing again

5. 

   5)

   oldturk said on 6/8/2007 @ 4:05pm PT: [Permalink]

   Yesterday I did,.. could not see or post a comment,..
   and when there was a link to read the rest of the story an odd page came up. It was from Apache software that led to an error page. This page told you to contact the web page administrator (Brad ?) and explain the connection configuration problem with him. Do not contact Apache.

   It was like that from 2 PM to 7 PM,.. then it started to work okay. During the time it was down/or out no adverts or photo pictures were visible only a white box with a little red cross/”X” were the photo would have been.

6. 

   6)

   oldturk said on 6/8/2007 @ 4:07pm PT: [Permalink]

   TEST – RE: TEST SEE ABOVE.

   {Sorry, turkie, dear…. Someone checked the wrong box or something and locked out commenting. There’s a notice at the top of the page now. –99}

7. 

   7)

   oldturk said on 6/8/2007 @ 4:45pm PT: [Permalink]

   Agent 99,..

   Well hello dear,.. have not seen /heard. What are you on a summer schedule writing a book pool side or from one of your beautiful sandy beaches ?

   Yes I saw that mauve box with the message. Thought he was still analyzing the difficulty, and I figured I would relay my log on snafu. ALL SEEMS TO BE WORKING NICELY TODAY.

8. 

   8)

   Agent 99 said on 6/8/2007 @ 6:25pm PT: [Permalink]

   Yes, writing, creating new blogs, bumping into walls, doing my secret bodhisattva thing and tromping on the beach. I am a heartless bitch when it comes to Ms. Hilton, but I am indeed glad the world will come to a stop over not-harsh-enough punishment, because that will keep me from being interrupted by the rapid-fire offenses to my sensibilities of the last 6+ years.

9. 

   9)

   empy1000 said on 6/8/2007 @ 6:48pm PT: [Permalink]

   your link to “bush lawyers up” goes to the wrong story.

   {ED NOTE: Corrected the link. Sorry about that. Thanks for letting me know. — BF}

10. 

    10)

    oldturk said on 6/8/2007 @ 7:07pm PT: [Permalink]

    Breath deep and often,..
    hum as you exhale,..
    it will soon be over,..
    bu$$hCo,.. that is.

    We all hope and pray !! (??)

    Don’t click this link.

11. 

    11)

    Dredd said on 6/9/2007 @ 5:06am PT: [Permalink]

    One thing in favor of Schlozman is that the 4 he indicted did plead guilty.

    The criticism is that he timed it just before an election to influence that election.

    Why that is not good is that moles can be placed within movements very easily, and those moles can do the nefarious bidding of controllers in the White House and break the law intentionally so as to bring charges just before an election. And plead guilty to a pre-arranged no-jail and record cleansing deal.

    I was suspicious even of the Jefferson case in Louisiana. He is now claiming that the FBI indicated to him that he was helping the FBI to nab crims in Africa and here in the US.

    He claims that they set him up after he agreed to help them to some degree. No the House is impaired.

    I was suspicious because they claimed to have a slam dunk case two years ago, but just now charged him.

    I hope they get a really good jury so we can get to the bottom of it and send him to jail if he did a crime, or send some FBI officials to jail if they set him up for political reasons.

    I have no doubt they would do so, but that does not mean they did do it. Let the jury decide.

12. 

    12)

    Dredd said on 6/9/2007 @ 5:45am PT: [Permalink]

    The two big deals that promise to really blow the lid off the bushie regime is the coverup at DOJ of the warrantless wiretapping of American citizens for partisan political reasons (to dig up “dirt” and use it against anyone attempting oversight and prosecution of “high crimes and misdemeanors”); and the concurrent partisan politicizing of the “voter fraud” canard.

    The desperation of clinging to Gonzales is explained by asking the question:

    “What would a real attorney general do (even Ashcroft thought the White What House wanted to do illegal wiretapping) when s/he sees the evidence of massive partisan political criminal operations?”

    Gonzales is a puppet of the White What House, not a real attorney general, and he will do their bidding and prosecute only the enemies of the White What House, who by now, include the people as the all time lows in the polls show.

    So they are desperate to keep him as the titular figure head of the Department of Justice Just Us to protect “just us” instead of the people.