Guest Blogged by John Gideon of VotersUnite.org
Yesterday while voters in New Hampshire were going to the polls a large group of activists filled the Board of Supervisors conference room in Pima County Arizona. A judge recently decided that the county should release the database from the 2006 primary and general election. The supervisors began by voting not to appeal the court’s decision. Then a raucous crowd of more than 60 people demanded to be heard. John Brakey was gaveled down and threatened with expulsion. The board decided to hear from the citizens and after hearing from about 20 the board turned totally and unanimously agreed to release the 2006 primary and general election data tapes, PLUS the RTA data that was the original reason for the court case. Great job by the folks in Pima County and by our friend John Brakey.
The Cuyahoga Co. Ohio Board of Elections is discussing the possibility of seeking a refund from Premier/Diebold for the DRE voting system that has been failing miserably for the past two years. As much as that system has been a disaster Premier should just refund the total purchase price of $21M and consider themselves lucky.
For the past two years counties in Arkansas have had huge problems with ballot programming supplied by ES&S. Many of those counties have decided to leave the vendor out of the process and they are doing it themselves. Any progress toward getting the vendors out of voting administration is good progress.
Just minutes ago it was reported that the county clerk in Hancock Co Illinois is requesting the DoJ to investigate the deceptive practices of ES&S....
- NAtional: 99 Ways to Steal Elections: The Story of John Fund and Ron Paul
- AR: Smooth Electronic Voting Expected
- AZ: Pima County - RTA databases to be released
Info from '06 election may help clear the air over integrity issue
- AZ: Pima County Board of Supervisors Advances Election Integrity with Vote to Release All 2006 Election Databases
- CA: Monterey County - Observation panel to watch over local primary
Part of condition to recertify touch-screen voting
- CA: San Bernardino County - County joins lawsuit against secretary of state
- CA: San Bernardino County - County joins suit on ballot counting
- CA: San Bernardino County - S.B. County joins lawsuit testing new vote recount order
- CO: Legislators lose their confidence in Coffman
- CO: Editorial - Election land mine
- CO: Columnist - Fried: Legislature Must Quickly Grapple with State Election Meltdown
- CO: Denver may get voting reprieve
Clerk: Coffman says he's 'likely' to OK equipment
- CO: Denver - Coffman changes tune on machines
Denver's clerk says she was told he might recertify the voting system after an appeal.
- CT: Vote Tally Discrepancy Reported To State
- FL: Hillsborough County - Sample ballot mailed with Rudy boo-boo
Hillsborough elections chief apologizes.
- IL: DuPage County - DuPage, state differ on files
Commission stands by its destruction of election records
- IL: DuPage County - County must get state permission to destroy election files
- IL: Hancock County - Election vendor accused of deceptive practice
- MA: Technology empowers visually impaired voters
- MT: Gallatin County - Group wants county voting machines decertified
- NC: Ghost in the voting machine
- NM: Voter Beware
- NY: Voting machine deadline looms
New York officials to choose options this month for voters with disabilities.
- NY: N.Y. sets timetable on ballot machines
- OH: Study pushes for changes to Ohio elections
Secretary of state’s recommendations include centralized vote centers, optical-scan ballots and ‘no fault’ absentee voting
- OH: Columnist - We're all paying and paying for Florida's 2000 election meltdown - Kevin O'Brien
- OH: State scrambling to find $31 million
Cuyahoga County, 56 others looking to replace electronic voting systems before March primary
- OH: Cuyahoga County - Elections Board seeks refund for faulty touch-screen system
- OH: Franklin County - Price tag for ballot directive may rise
Proposed number to print is too low, county insists
- OH: Marion County - How will you vote?
- OH: Trumbull County – Editorial - Local voting plan better than Brunner’s
- OH: Trumbull County - Local officials weigh in on vulnerable voting machines
- PA: Northampton County - County racing to find new voting machines
Officials will meet with vendors Tuesday. They must pick by month's end to be set for primary.
- PA: Northampton County - Retiring the lever voting machines for the second time
- TX: Waller County - Waller early voting plan opposed
Black officials urge feds to rule that one-site limit is discriminatory
- WV: Opinion - W.Va. Right About Voting Machines
- WV: Voting Machines Criticized in Harrison, Belmont and Jefferson
- VoterID: Voter ID requirement comes under fire
Indiana is one of only three states nationally to require identification in order to vote
- VoterID: Court Hears Voter ID Case
- VoterID: Opinion - Requiring voter ID at the polls is a snake-oil remedy
- VoterID: Editorial - The Court and Voter ID’s
- VoterID: Supreme Court to hear Indiana voter ID law
- VoterID: Project 21 Members Argue that Voter ID Laws Depress Fraud, not Turnout
- VoterID: Editorial - Voter ID law is a fraud
- VoterID: Supreme Court Weighs Voter ID Requirements
- VoterID: Supreme Court Hears Challenge to Voter ID Law
Indiana Law Requires Voters to Show Identification at Polls
**"Daily Voting News" is meant as a comprehensive listing of reports each day concerning issues related to election and voting news around the country regardless of quality or political slant. Therefore, items listed in "Daily Voting News" may not reflect the opinions of VotersUnite.Org or BradBlog.Com**