A county clerk in Colorado has finally done the right thing for the voters by removing a touch-screen voting machine from service, and quarantining it, after it was discovered to be flipping votes from one candidate to another. The failed machine in this case was a Diebold Accu-Vote, a frequent flipper.
As reported by the Colorado Independent (Hat-tip VoterAction.org)…
“I always just trusted the machines, and it opened my eyes,” said state Rep. Mary Hodge. “The way it works now, I’m told “¦ is that those votes throw it to Mr. Hadfield that we’ll probably have a lawsuit and a court decision. We’ll have to wait and see.”
Hodge, the Democratic nominee, faces Republican Robert John Hadfield in the race to represent state Senate District 25.
…
“I have quarantined the machine,” Long told the newspaper. “It’s removed and it’s sealed up and it’s in a bag.” She said she is awaiting instructions from the secretary of state’s office.
Long is to be lauded for being the first election official in the country so far during the general election (that we’re aware of) to have taken the correct action in such a vote-flipping case. And now that Hodge’s eyes are “opened” we hope that both she and her Republican opponent, Hadfield will stand up for their voters by signing the StandingForVoters.org “no concessions” pledge immediately!
Late last night VelvetRevolution.us (a non-partisan, non-profit election watchdog co-founded by The BRAD BLOG) issued a press release calling on election officials to not recalibrate systems mid-election, but rather remove and impound them, and offer voters paper ballots as needed instead. The complete press release is posted at the end of this article.
Colorado has a troubling history with electronic voting, even as the Secretary of State found all of the state’s machines to be faulty and easily hackable in late 2007, but has capitulated to pressure from election officials to allow them to be used by voters again this year anyway…
Problems Not New to Colorado…
In another story on the removal of Adams County’s Diebold machine, it was noted that the system was quarantined “as per the Secretary of State’s instructions”. We’re not sure if those were instructions given only to Long, or if SoS Mike Coffman had issued a directive somewhere on this. We’ll try to find out. In any case, we hope other CO officials (as well as officials in other states where this occurs) will follow Long’s lead and take the same action she did.
SoS Coffman — who is overseeing his own election this year in his bid for the U.S. House — previously decertified all but the Diebold voting systems in his state after an exhaustive court-ordered certification test (and after it was found that his Congressional campaign shared the same PR outfit with Diebold). Following his decertification last December, which discovered all of the machines used by his state were easily hacked and prone to serious errors, he recertified all of them after receiving pressure from CO county election clerks.
One of those officials, the state’s Election Director Holly Lowder, resigned in disgrace just last month after it was discovered she shared her residence with one of the state’s top election vendors.
Following Similar Failures in Other States, Watchdog Calls for Impounding…
Previously, after votes were noticed to have flipped during early voting this year on Direct Recording Electronic (DRE, usually touch-screen) systems in WV, in TN, in TX and other states, election officials have often first (and completely inappropriately) blamed the voters, and then instructed poll workers to “recalibrate” the machines.
Calibrating an electronic voting machine mid-election, however, as we’ve pointed out repeatedly, is irresponsible and dangerous, and — as demonstrated by this West Virginia County clerk on video tape — ineffective, as it often fails to correct the problem at all.
Whether a vote is seen flipping or not on a DRE, it must be noted, there is no way to verify that any vote ever cast on such a system in any election for any candidate or initiative on the ballot has ever been recorded accurately. That’s a fact whether or not such a system offers a so-called “paper trail” print-out, as even the DREs with such print-outs can be easily and quickly hacked in a way that would be next to impossible to discover as shown in this video demonstration from the state-sponsored computer scientists at the UCSB Computer Security Group.
While we have asked repeatedly for any such evidence to show that any such vote has ever been recorded as per a voter’s intent during an election, no election official, or voting machine company representative has ever been able to offer any. That’s because none exists.
DRE machines require 100% faith-based voting, with faith applied solely in the private company who created and programmed the machine, and the election officials who force voters to use them in our public elections.
Moreover, Diebold was forced to admit in August that their GEMS central tabulator system, used with both DRE and paper-based optical-systems in 34 states this year, routinely drops thousands of votes without notifying system administrators.
Our complete special coverage page on DRE Failures 2008 (General Election Version), including what you can do about it, if it happens to you, is right here…
VR’s press release, issued today, calling for the immediate removal from service and impounding of such machines, is both posted here, and follows in full below…
Where Are The Election Protection Attorneys?
Non-Profit Election Watchdog Demands Failed Machines
Be Removed from Service, Impounded
Velvet Revolution (“VR”), a non-profit dedicated to fair, honest, accurate and transparent elections, today called for elections officials in all states to immediately impound any voting machine that has flipped votes from one candidate to another. It has been widely reported in the media over the past week of early voting that Direct Recording Election (DRE, usually touch-screen) voting machines made by ES&S, Diebold, Sequoia and Hart InterCivic have been flipping votes, predominantly from Democratic candidates to Republican candidates, but in some reported cases, just the opposite. (See: https://bradblog.com/?page_id=6577).
These vote flips were first reported in West Virginia and the elections official there quickly ordered the recalibration of some machines, but video has shown that recalibration does not correct the problem and the flips continue. (See: http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/2008/10/video_the_vote_captures_video.html)
Vote flipping has also now reported to have occurred in Texas, Tennessee, Missouri, Nevada, Colorado, Georgia and elsewhere.
“Machines that flip votes should never be recalibrated,” said Brad Friedman, co-founder of Velvet Revolution. “Accessing these election-ready machines in this way, when they are most vulnerable to malicious software and manipulation, is wholly inappropriate. It is outrageous that election officials have ordered such action. Instead, failing machines must be immediately removed from service, impounded for later inspection, and voters should be given paper ballots to assure their vote may be counted accurately.”
VR also demands that the legal teams associated with the candidates step up and take immediate legal action to quarantine these faulty voting machines. The Obama campaign has made much of the fact that it has thousands of lawyers on the ground to ensure that this election is fair and everyone’s vote is counted. “Unfortunately, these lawyers, the lawyers for McCain and the lawyers for the DNC and RNC are AWOL and asleep at the wheel,” continued Friedman. “We insist that they keep their promise to the voters by demanding that these machines be taken out of service immediately. We should not have to wait until after the election for a candidate to sue because voters were not allowed to properly register their votes.”
SOURCE Velvet Revolution
https://bradblog.com/?page_id=6577
At the same time that it’s good to create software to search out the possible “programming errors” that change vote totals, this is not a solution because it’s a game of cat and mouse (where the cat isn’t allowed to actually catch the mouse). The fraudulent software designers will create more sophisticated software and the EI people will have to develop better mouse traps. In the interim you only have a few legitimate elections while many are flipped.
Why aren’t parties held responsible for their actions??? Rove or other dirty tricksters can give the command to do such things but are never held accountable. If the Dems or Repubs were told they would forfeit elctions where dirty tricks were found AND couldn’t run any of their candidates in the next election after they were found to be cheating in this way, they would think twice about cheating. Bush was put in office and got to destroy the country because there are no consequences (on the books or in enforcement) for such political thievery.
They do it because they can get away with it and there is so much to gain.
Karen Long deserves a STANDING OVATION!!
You know who should examine that machine? Ed Felton and his crew. He’s the Chuck Norris of voting machines.
What I don’t understand is, if this was the result of malicious programming to steal votes for the GOP, why would they program it in such a way that the vote flipping could be seen on the display? Seems to me the programmer should just flip the vote when it is stored, but leave the display alone. Then no one would be the wiser.
Mty guess is there is some kind of leftover code from the original tabulation program that isn’t fully erased by the malicious “patch”. That’s why a botched installation might yield some revealing evidence on the screen. What you see is the tip of the iceberg.
These faulty machines are puzzling.
Some possibilities (some are a bit far out there, I know):
1) Fraud folly — these machines are the result of fraud programming mistakes. Could be deliberate, even — the programmers are sending us a message.
2) Crappy machines. Well — why always a Republican advantage? And…when was the last time you used an ATM and hit the $100 cash button and it flipped to $200.00?? C’mon…
3) Voter error. Yeah, right…
4) Making the fraud so obvious in part that we dismiss it. Like walking out of a neighbor’s house in broad daylight with their computer while they were at home. Anybody watching would assume it was legit somehow. Then the real thievery is done behind the scenes but fraud has already been dismissed. (This is me trying to think like Rove. I feel…icky, somehow 😉
5. Umm…miscalibration….??
My money’s on #4.
This is email explanation from Colorado Democratic Party Chairperson claiming party attorneys are “watching” electronic ballot fraud.
IT IS PAST TIME TO START FILING LAWSUITS AND DISTRICT COURT PETITIONS. Is “watching” an actual improvement over the pathetic betrayal of voters and democracy, in 2004, by John Kerry and John Edwards, who failed to contest the massive, blatant election fraud in Ohio, although they had millions of dollars of campaign funds left to fight the fraud?
Colorado Democratic Chairwoman, Pat Waak, Claims Attorneys Are “Watching”
[Ed Note: Some cut and paste from this blog deleted. Cliff, please read our rules for commenting. Thank you. –99]
OK, the Dems are afraid. They think they have more to lose by fighting than by “watching.” Learned helplessness.
From Clif’s comment and the email he received:
“I have personally been publicly attacked…”
Intimidation tactics have been successful.
seems pretty amateurish for the machines to actually light up for the wrong candidate, I mean aren’t we all in agreement that e-vote fraud has been committed in countless elections since at least 2000? Like Jim CT says, “tip of the iceberg”… yet they’ve managed to pull off this multi-year, nationwide black-ops-sorta heist without ANYONE involved coming forward save Clint Curtis, who was under the impression he was HELPING the cause of voting integrity? So on one hand you have this ultra-sophisticated operation with such high stakes, and such severe consequences if caught it’s unimaginable; yet, here they are leaving the evidence out in the open? I guess that’s what Lora/ #6 is getting at, although I don’t agree with the conclusion- I’m saying WTF basically. It don’t make no sense! But then again, what part of e-voting does make sense? Bravo to Karen Long- she may well end up being an important person in history, if this machine is found to have been tampered with.
Karen Long should be honored as woman of the year, as heroine (is that a word?).
I think they may be using this as a decoy. The only way to solve the problems is to impound all machines that doesn’t work as expected.
While everyone is waiting here with baited breath, they are going to continue everywhere else. I doubt anything will be found wrong with this single machine.
I personally think there was problems in the last election that was caused by criminal activity. But I also think a lot of the problems we are seeing now are mechanical faults with these machines.
But nobody will know unless ALL the problem machines are inspected.
One machine impounded is a start but not a very good start at all.
He removed ONE machine ? Only one ? Big whoop !
It is far past time that ALL of the touch screen machines should have been removed altogether and trashed – – and Diebold and the other manufacturers of these vote cheating robots should have been investigated and dealt with by the law after the Princeton tests and others demonstrated repeatedly that these machines created havoc with the vote count, at least two years ago. But the Cheney/Bush criminal team and the corrupt Republican Party have been using them to steal votes in tight races or to confuse the vote count so badly that they could then contest the elections in the courts that they have also corrupted.
Under Cheney/Bush we have been run like a banana republic.
vote for diebold for socialism