Guest Blogged by Ellen Theisen of VotersUnite.org
In spite of a plethora of reports from experts explaining its inherent insecurity, lack of transparency, and non-auditability, online voting continues to be proposed as a viable method of holding elections. The EAC is holding a public hearing tomorrow on counting the votes of military and overseas voters (where online voting is sure to come up). An Alabama bill to allow such voters to return ballots by email died in the state senate, but only because of some "bad amendments."
And Hawaii is currently in the process of holding its first-ever digital online and telephone election (even though the state has a requirement for a voter-verified paper record and audits). The Chief of Products and Partnerships with the company that got the contract for the online Hawaii election claims, not surprisingly, that the system is "faster, more reliable, and more secure than if they had voted on paper."...
- NAtional: EAC Public Hearing Tomorrow. Military and Overseas Citizens: Counting Their Votes - Part 1.
- AL: Overseas voter bill sinks
- AL: Amendment sinks overseas Internet voting bill
- CT: Nov 08 Election Audit Reports - Part 1 - Bad Cards, Procedural Lapses Continue
- CT: Nov 08 Election Audit Reports - Part 2 - Counting Not Extremely Accurate
- HI: Digital decision making
- HI: America's Newest State Holds America's Newest Election
- TX: Killeen considers electronic voter login
- India: Jammed EVM holds up one result in Uttar Pradesh Sindh Today
- India: Cong questions EVMS, accused BJD of using public money
"To encourage citizen ownership of transparent, participatory democracy." The Creekside Declaration. March 22, 2008
**Articles and commentary included in "Daily Voting News" do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the editors of Daily Voting News, VotersUnite.Org, or BradBlog.Com. Articles are selected for inclusion to inform subscribers' ability to draw their own conclusions based on noteworthy and credible news, research, legislation, and debate bearing on the integrity of elections.**