As I’ve previously mentioned, I’m currently a bit snowed-under working on some background stuff related to all of this mess. So my ability to report the latest here is somewhat hobbled for the (hopefully) very short term. I hope it’ll soon prove to have been worthwhile however.
I am still keeping an eye on everything however, and will report the most notable stuff as it comes up.
That said, lemme just throw out a raw link to this Democratic Underground posting which presents a potentially very troubling analysis of the results data in regards to the North Carolina Presidential and Senatorial races there.
I highly recommend you give it a look. It’s a detailed post and analysis, demonstrating some disturbing results. I have gotten into the habit of waiting to report such analysis until all the “debunkers” have had there go at things, just to make sure the analysis is solid, and then have attempted to summarize the key pieces.
For now though, since the story is holding up for the moment, and I’m pulled over to related work, I’m just giving you the link to look at without my own analysis for now. I hope to have some, along with a summary, later for you.







The information is incorrect, it is based on a faulty mathematical formula. I am attempting to correct it at the moment. Check back at Kos soon, hopefully people will realize the mistake.
Gracchi, I have seen your attempts over there to correct the information, but from what I’ve seen you’ve not yet been successful.
Please explain clearly here how *you* see the flaw in the logic, and I will do my best to investigate your explanation.
For the moment, all the discussion I’ve seen at Kos seems to hold up the original NC hypothesis.