Blogged by John Gideon on 10/5/2005 12:09PM  
Further Disenfranchises Democratic Voters, Doesn't Guarantee Accuracy of Results...
Clint Curtis: 'Feeney Trying to Protect His Fixed Voting System'

Guest blogged by John Gideon of VotersUnite.Org

In a move that some people found amazing and others expected, Rep. Tom Feeney (R-FL) has filed a new elections bill. HR-3910 ? Verifying the Outcome of Tomorrow's Elections Act of 2005 does nothing to verify the outcome of "tomorrow's" elections, but it does further the RNC's wish to keep as many poor, elderly, disabled, and people of color (in other words ? normally Democratic voters) away from the polls as they possibly can.

And who is this Rep. Feeney? If you recall, he was the person alleged to have asked for a programmer to write software to switch the touch-screen votes, undetected, in Florida. Clint Curtis, whose story was originally broken here at BRAD BLOG, was the programmer. When asked about this latest step by Feeney, he responded via email simply: ?Appears that Mr. Feeney is still trying to protect his fixed voting system?.

Around the water coolers on ?The Hill?, there has been talk that Rush Holt's Voter Confidence and Increased Accessibility Act (HR 550) would be going to mark-up sometime in October. It is timely that suddenly Rep. Feeney would produce a bill that will now allow the House leaders to blend the two bills and make one bill that represents their view of privatization of elections.

This bill provides for a voter verified paper audit trail but it leaves to the states how that audit trail will be used, if at all. No verification there.

The outrageous portion of the bill is the part that discusses a voter ID requirement. No driver's license, state ID card, student ID, library card or utility bill will do, according to this bill. Instead, in order to qualify, a voter will require:

(2) MINIMUM DOCUMENT REQUIREMENTS- To meet the requirements of this subsection, a State shall include, at a minimum, the following information and features on each photo identification issued to a person by the State for purposes of subsection (b):

(A) The person's full legal name.

(B) The person's date of birth.

(C) The person's gender.

(D) The person's number for the form of the identification.

(E) A digital photograph of the person.

(F) The person's address of principle residence.

(G) The person's signature.

(H) Physical security features designed to prevent tampering, counterfeiting, or duplication of the document for fraudulent purposes.

(I) A common machine-readable technology, with defined minimum data elements.

(3) MINIMUM ISSUANCE STANDARDS

(A) IN GENERAL- To meet the requirements of this subsection, a State shall require, at a minimum, presentation and verification of the following information before issuing a photo identification to a person for purposes of subsection (b):

(i) A photo identity document, except that a non-photo identity document is acceptable if it includes both the person's full legal name and date of birth.

(ii) Documentation showing the person's date of birth.

(iii) Proof of the person's social security account number or verification that the person is not eligible for a social security account number.

(iv) Documentation showing the person's name and address of principal residence.

And what if the voter is an absentee voter? According to this bill they will have to include a copy of their ID, with SSN and address and personal information, in the envelope along with their ballot.

Last week, in response to the unbelievably poor Baker-Carter Commission report, and the rumors in DC that HR-550 may be going for ?mark-up', VoteTrustUSA and other groups began a write-in campaign asking members of congress to leave HR-550 untouched. This seems to be the best approach at this time.

Here's a link to the text of the bill.

Guest blogged by:
John Gideon, Information Manager
VotersUnite.Org and VoteTrustUSA.org

For more info on The BRAD BLOG's continuing investigative series on The Clint Curtis/Tom Feeney/Yang Enterprises Vote-Rigging Scandal series, please see:
- A Quick Summary of the story so far.
- An Index of all the Key Articles & Evidence in the series so far.
Buzz this story! C2NN: Submit it!


READER COMMENTS ON
"Tom Feeney --- Alleged Vote-Rigging Conspirator --- Introduces New Elections Bill"
(15 Responses so far...)

COMMENT #1 [Permalink]
... Doug Eldritch said on 10/5/2005 @ 1:04 pm PT...


Well well!!!!
http://thomas.loc.gov/cg...n/query/z?c109:H.R.3910:
We're on top of the little sonofabitch crooks now.....Looks like Feeney's enforcing Torture Gonzales's little law and trying to force it into the public!

""Our goal is to make cheating easier and voting harder.""

For this reason, he would have succeeded....

SOMETHING TELLS ME THOUGH, TOM FEENEY SHOULD BE IN JAIL.....HE DID MAKE THE FRAUD PROGRAM, DIDN'T HE!!!!!

Beyond Tom: Tom Feeney

Lets get this bastard and by the way.....WHO KNOWS ANYONE IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY THERE WHO ISN'T CROOKED, SO WE CAN IMPANEL A GRAND JURY IMMEDIATELY?

This crook Feeney just stepped in it.....He should be not passing go again, never collect his $200, go directly to jail and spill his guts........WE'RE BACK, YOU FREAK!
Doug


COMMENT #2 [Permalink]
... Vance said on 10/5/2005 @ 2:10 pm PT...


All of this is a bit hard to swallow. Of special significance for me is:

"And what if the voter is an absentee voter? According to this bill they will have to include a copy of their ID, with SSN and address and personal information, in the envelope along with their ballot."

As an absentee voter (and generally identity-theft paranoid) I wouldn't entertain the thought of putting all that information into an envelope and send it through the mail. That just screams STEAL ME for FREE CREDIT CARDS. And what then? Long waits at the polls while everyone is 100% ID checked?


COMMENT #3 [Permalink]
... Styve said on 10/5/2005 @ 2:19 pm PT...


The GOP is so arrogant and it will hopefully bite them in the ass!!

First there was Bushco rehiring Brown as a consultant to keep him quiet, and letting him perjure himself right off the bat.

Then how about Bush bringing Miers into the public eye, though she was complicit in many of his scandals over the years, and may even have knowledge of Bush's overlooking the 8/6/01 PDB?!?!

And now this...letting one of the original proponents of the design of vote-flipping technology present a bill to prevent election fraud...huh?!?!

What stones!! Doug is right - why isn't this asshole in jail?! Anti-intellectualism must be a component of Fascism.

Styve

Styve


COMMENT #4 [Permalink]
... Doug Eldritch said on 10/5/2005 @ 3:04 pm PT...


Sounds like we need a pretty large prison cell for the whole crew, Vance....

Delay's money laundering carousel: Blunt & Feeney & co fingered

Did these dirty neocon republicans actually think they could get away with it, and then make MORE illegal contributions on top of that to support election fraud!???

Example: Thomas Noe, the front man for Fraud in ohio.

Michael Brown, another front man for Fraud in Florida doing worse things than Jeb Bush.

Constance Kaplan, a front woman for Fraud who was stupid enough to show how ES&S employees "rigged" the machines to destroy undervotes. I mean come on.

The list goes on and on......Delay and his cartel are crooked sons of guns, and thanks to us Federal prosecutors got evidence.....But what about FEENEY?!

Who knows a special "counsel" in Florida, whos NOT as CORRUPT or anywhere near Jeb Bush or Bill Nelson?! Who knows someone in Florida's democratic party, green party, ANY party who can NAIL this arse FEENEY?!!

Doug


COMMENT #5 [Permalink]
... gtash said on 10/5/2005 @ 3:48 pm PT...


The "blending" of two bills by committee in congress is always an "under the radar" event. IT is under-reported and I hear the Republican majority likes closed sessions in the middle of the night a whole lot. The problem , it seems to me, is shining a spotlight on this entire problem. I know Brad and the Velvets and Black Box have done a whole lot of work to do just that, and Rep Conyers too. But it isn't enough. The public has left verified voting to boil away on the back burner. Someone please tell me how this is going to be different this time? I have contacted my Congressman--more than once---and my homestate of NC had one of the more noteworthy problems with voting machines. But the outrage is not being translated into effective resistance.


COMMENT #6 [Permalink]
... MMIIXX said on 10/5/2005 @ 3:53 pm PT...


Voter fraud can be counted on fingers and toes ,Election fraud was in the millions of votes ,you figure...

Drag Clinton Curtis out and IMPANEL A GRAND JURY IMMEDIATELY.

Up to 600,000 against the war in DC ,how many against Election Fraud ?


COMMENT #7 [Permalink]
... BillORightsMan said on 10/5/2005 @ 4:00 pm PT...


These people have no shame. All they do is obfuscate, distort and lie. You can tell when you got 'em red-handed when they start calling you names. It's a dead give-away!

Perhaps we should give some love to Mr. Feeney's opponent in FL-24:
Andy Michaud, "Dr. Andy" (D)
Veterinarian, former candidate for Florida Commissioner of Agriculture and Consumer Services

Andy Michaud for Congress 2006 - FL District 24

I don't know anything about FL-24, if it's blood red or more purple. At least the Dems have a candidate there!

Of course, it all comes back to the corporate shills of MSM. This story deserves front-page scrutiny. And yes, Feeney should be in jail. Does he know Abramof, too?


COMMENT #8 [Permalink]
... Doug Eldritch said on 10/5/2005 @ 4:38 pm PT...


Would Clint Curtis testify to a Grand Jury for crying out loud!???

Lets get this together...Who knows a special prosecutor in FLORIDA?!???

Doug


COMMENT #9 [Permalink]
... czaragorn said on 10/6/2005 @ 8:31 am PT...


Doug, I believe that there are no special prosecutors in Florida or anywhere else, for that matter, until they are appointed by someone like, say, the justice department or the governor. And I'm no expert, but I don't believe "we" can just empanel grand juries. Any of us 6 or 7 out there know anything about this type of law? Can we force referendums onto ballots via petitions? Let's not just rant and rave (although it sure does feel good sometimes), let's find a practical way we can actually throw these bums out, and switch to paper and pencil ballots and supervised hand counts by volunteer citizens and witnessed by any interested citizens, as they do in Canada or Germany (it was the US that imposed this standard on the Germans post-WWII, and it's still working fine for them).

Love and Peace and Lot's of "Hard Work" - Bob


COMMENT #10 [Permalink]
... jIM cIRILE said on 10/6/2005 @ 10:52 am PT...


Maybe the logical thing to do here is to have Clint Curtis, or someone speaking on his behalf (Brad?) contact Fitzgerald's office and ask if they would be interested in what he has to say.

If they are not, then perhaps they can refer you to someone who would be.

I agree, these people must be stopped. The time is now.


COMMENT #11 [Permalink]
... jIM cIRILE said on 10/6/2005 @ 11:00 am PT...


Or perhaps if anyone here is an attorney, that might be the move. Maybe Brad or Winter could put you in touch with Clint, and then put in a call to Fitzgerald's office. A call from an attorney would have a bit more weight.


COMMENT #12 [Permalink]
... hacked909 said on 10/6/2005 @ 12:43 pm PT...


Tom Feeney is what being a neo-con today is all about. That we have members of Congress like him is living proof that elections are rigged.

******************************************

It is quite painful for many of us to listen to George Bush giving speeches as though he had been duly elected as our president. For those of us aware of the cons long-standing plans for invasions in the Middle East (there new world order). We who read of their expressed needs for a new Pearl Harbor type event to gain support for such invasions. It is most difficult for those of us aware of the long-standing friendships between the Bushes and the Ben Ladens and of past favors rendered to listen to this now. We hear again his using that same event to justify their wars and for grabbing further powers and further restricting our freedoms. All is this is quite trying on those of us who have faced honestly all available facts involving 9-11, and those of us who are painfully aware of all evidence that is being still withheld from us. To know that we are listening to the worst kind of criminals using their-own criminal deeds of that day to justify further crimes against the people of this country and much of the world.

It is a truly drastic type of character disorder which permits so much planned devastation that they might pursues there agendas of greed and premeditated plans for shifting all wealth. For those of us with a clear grasp of what they have done and of what they are now attempting to do, it is quite difficult for us see the likes of George Bush standing behind a presidential podium and still successfully deceiving some, still blaming there extreme misdeeds on others and using them to justify continuing on their most dangerous missions.

Those of us who, by whatever means, have been able to avoid being deceived now have a real burden upon us. We need to do all that we can to make others aware as to the magnitude of what we are up against.

Hopefully the indictments will arive in time to save some of the country from their ongoing efforts.


COMMENT #13 [Permalink]
... Doug Eldritch said on 10/6/2005 @ 6:35 pm PT...


Good point....

Fitzgerald would no doubt understand it breaks the law, but he has no jurisdiction for Florida.

We need to bombard the Justice Department and get someone into Florida or an independent counsel.

We could start with standing beside Conyers and Congress and repeatedly mailing them about the situation, about Clint Curtis's evidence and so on....

Not sure if they'll buy it right away...But we don't want the evidence destroyed by Gonzales or anyone, the vote-rigging problem is EXTREME so its an extreme case.

Here is the Department of Justice....Start flooding them about doing some investigations..

http://www.usdoj.gov

Note that Feeney's a little on the insane side....We need someone who has no connections to crooked Jeb Bush or Bill Nelson!

AskDOJ@usdoj.gov

Doug E.


COMMENT #14 [Permalink]
... WHTT said on 10/8/2005 @ 4:31 am PT...


Write your rep.

As easy as a couple clicks.

http://www.dailykos.com/...ry/2005/10/8/655/02291#2
explains and has link below in clickable form

http://www.congressweb.c...ode=VTUSA&hotissue=1
faster


COMMENT #15 [Permalink]
... yank had enuf said on 10/9/2005 @ 11:46 am PT...


Thanks to bloggers like John Gideon, we are getting the whole picture about what Tom Feeney is up to now>>> on the surface, "paper trail " looks good, but as Gideon points out, how it is used (or not used ) by the states makes unverifiable paper like having no paper at all!

I've put together a Political Friendster thread that includes the significant "players" in the Tom Feeney alleged vote-rigging conspiracy story (hopefully more , as it progresses) ... please feel free to add on any notables I've left out !

http://www.politicalfrie...2328&name=Tom-Feeney


-=- Comments on this item are now closed. -=-


VotersUnite.org's Daily Voting News 'Daily Voting News'
For December 04, 2008

by John Gideon

The Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA) was signed into law in Oct. 2002. Amongst other things HAVA required the formation of the Election Assistance Commission (EAC) and provided some mandates, in Title III of the law, for federal elections including some standards for voting systems. Those standards include, but are not limited to, accessibility for voters with disabilities and accuracy in the vote count. Testing by experts in accessibility has shown that none of the Direct Recording Electronic (DRE, usually touch-screen) voting systems presently in use meet the requirements for accessibility for disabled voters. Failures in testing and vote counting in real elections have also proven that, at times, the voting systems presently being used across the country do not meet the federally mandated requirements for accuracy.

So what guidance has been provided by the EAC to the states with regards to Title III? Well, actually none. In fact even though voting systems presently in use do not meet federal law the EAC is just now getting around to issuing guidance to state and local election officials and, according to the draft of the plan ‘featured’ below, it is going to take another two years before the EAC can complete the guidance.

Why can’t they just tell the vendors and the states that the law is clear and, if they fail to follow that law, violations will be referred to the DoJ? The fact that the vendors misrepresent their products as being accessible is a clear violation of the law. It is time they are held responsible and it doesn’t take two years of studying Title III of HAVA to make that clear....

Click for links to all of today's notable voting news headlines...

Support The BRAD BLOG
Please visit our advertisers




Spend your advertising dollars wisely! And support the good guys at the same time! or Advertise with the good guys! We're it!



Fight the H8 in Your State











OTHER SITES
Groomsmen Gifts - Pub signs can be personalized for a unique gift for your wedding party.

Support The BRAD BLOG
Please visit our advertisers
Brad Friedman's
The BRAD BLOG



Go to front page...

Recent Entries

Archives
Important Docs
A Few Great Blogs
Political Cartoonists
Special Coverage Pages...
Touch-Screen Vote-Flipping 2008

L.A. County "Double Bubble" Debacle

2008 New Hampshire Primary Mess

Riverside CA, Sequoia Hack Challenge

Tom Feeney/Clint Curtis Voting Riggging Scandal
Summary...
Key Articles/Docs...
GOP ACORN 'Voter Fraud' Hoax

Ann Coulter's Voter Fraud Felony

Thor Hearne's 'American Center for Voting Rights'
GOP 'Voter Fraud' Scam

NM GOP/Rep. Heather Wilson 'Vote-Buying' Scandal

Rush Holt's Election Reform Bill (HR811)

'04 White House Website Scrubbing

· Make The BRAD BLOG your Homepage!
· Add The BRAD BLOG to favorites/bookmarks!
· Or syndicate The BRAD BLOG...
BRAD BLOG RSS 2.0 FEED
Add to My Yahoo! Subscribe in NewsGator Online