Blogged by Brad Friedman on 3/30/2006 10:45AM  
Palm Beach, FL Election Supervisor May Refer Charges to State Attorney if GOP Pundit/Propagandist Fails to Prove She Didn't Lie About Residency...
UPDATED: Property Records Show an 'Ann H Coulter' Owns a $1.8 Million House on Seabreeze Ave. in Palm Beach

You'll recall that in February the Palm Beach Post reported that "conservative" extremist Ann Coulter may have committed a vote fraud felony by signing someone else's address to her registration form in Florida and then voting in the wrong precinct --- a crime which, if convicted, could earn her three years behind bars.

(It's been pointed out to us that such bars would have to be very close together to keep her from simply slithering through them to escape...Though even at that, we're not sure there is steel strong enough to keep her from being able to chew her way to freedom. But we digress.)

A few days after the story originally broke, Coulter claimed publicly she didn't even live in Palm Beach where she reportedly committed the crime. The Post reporter who broke the story, Jose Lambiet, quickly replied that he had hard evidence that she does, in fact, live in Palm Beach (next door to town councilman Bill Brooks on Seabreeze Ave.) and he characterized Coulter's denial as "absolutely a bold-faced lie."

Yesterday the Palm Beach Post offered still more "skinny" on the latest in the Ann Coulter Voter Fraud Felony Scandal. Her denials about being a Palm Beach resident is about to be tested --- first by the Palm Beach County Election Supervisor Arthur Anderson, and then perhaps by the Florida State Attorney to whom the entire matter may be referred.

Coulter's now got 30 days to 'splain herself, according to Lambiet in the Post. Please read on...

This time, claiming she doesn't even live here --- as GOP pundit Ann Coulter has been doing on this spring's college speaking tour when she's questioned about her February election meltdown on Palm Beach --- isn't going to cut it.

Palm Beach County's elections supervisor has given the right wing's unofficial mouthpiece 30 days to explain why she voted in the wrong precinct.

In a registered letter scheduled to be sent to her this week, Coulter is asked to "clarify certain information as to her legal residence," elections boss Arthur Anderson said.

"We want to give her a chance," Anderson said. "She needs to tell us where she really lives."

Or else? He could refer the case to State Attorney Barry Krischer for criminal charges, Anderson said.

The letter, however, may be headed to the wrong house.

The bestselling author, whose The New Ann Coulter comes out in June, owns a homestead on Seabreeze Avenue, near Worth Ave. Yet, the missive is being sent to the Indian Road home of Realtor Suzanne Frisbie. Coulter claimed in official elections documents to be living there, which Frisbie denied last month.

"We have to send the registered letter to her address in our records," explained Charmaine Kelly, elections chief deputy. "If it comes back unsigned, we'll deal with that."

In his official incident report released last week, poll worker Jim Whited wrote that Coulter tried to vote in the Feb. 7 town council election at Bethesda-by-the-Sea, the right place for a Seabreeze resident. Coulter left in a hurry when, Whited said, he asked her to correct the record. Later she cast her ballot at the St. Edward's precinct, where real Indian Road residents go.

Coulter, a constitutional lawyer who relentlessly made fun of Palm Beach County voters after the botched 2000 presidential election, couldn't be reached for comment.

It's also been mentioned to us that Coulter could well be registered (illegally) to vote in New York and/or Connecticut as well as Florida. Anyone looking into that? We don't have time for the moment, but we're always happy to hear from erstwhile citizen investigators and/or tipsters who may have additional information on that.

With all of the despicably cynical GOP operatives out there trying to trick Americans into believing this country has an epidemic of Voter Fraud (it doesn't...but Election Fraud is an entirely different matter) it would certainly be impressive to see one of those snake-oil men (yes, I'm talking to you, ACVR) aggressively pursue the truth about their heroine hate-monger Coulter and her alleged Voting Fraud.

We fear, however, she may be neither dark enough nor "Democrat" enough for such creeps to spend their well-funded time on.

UPDATE: A DU commenter points us towards the Palm Beach Property Appraisers Public Access system which shows an "Ann H Coulter" who purchased a $1.8 million dollar property on Seabreeze Ave. in Palm Beach in March of 2005. Complete public info here.

UPDATE 3/31/06: Coulter's alleged Voter Fraud earns her Buzzflash's Hypocrite of the Week Award! Congratulations Ann!

Buzz this story! C2NN: Submit it!


READER COMMENTS ON
"PAPER: Ann Coulter Given 30 Days to Explain Vote Fraud Felony Allegation!"
(108 Responses so far...)

COMMENT #1 [Permalink]
... NeilDeal said on 3/30/2006 @ 12:26 pm PT...


Yet another example of Pub-tards that think they are above the law.
I can hear her now in her serpent-like voice,

But I'm rich! I can do anything I want!"


COMMENT #2 [Permalink]
... OleCraftyLiberals said on 3/30/2006 @ 12:47 pm PT...


With the elections coming in November, I think it's great that the "progressives" are showing their interest in the really important issues like Ann Coulter voting 37 feet over a precinct line. She is not going to jail over this you nimrods. It's some nut who is appeasing liberal bloggers that can say something like that.

Example #2: Harping about Dick Cheney's private hunting accident that the victim himself even acknowledged as "an accident". The victim has moved on, liberals haven't quite gotten their yet.

If liberals or Anderson were really serious about filing charges against Coulter and needed proof of her residence they could have accessed Palm Beach's online Property Tax Owner information. It's really easy.

Liberals act as if the only thing holding back an indictment is a FACTUAL affirmation of residence.

Well liberals, here it is:

http://www.co.palm-beach...wner=Coulter&city=-1

Merry Fitzmas! LOL.

Now call me crazy, but it's hard to believe that one conservative like me really is more resourceful than 20,000 liberals blathering but I suppose anything is possible.

Tell me that Anderson, or any of these other boobs that are part of a voting board could not have accessed this own damn information in their own town.

Another reason why liberals will not be running the country anytime soon.


COMMENT #3 [Permalink]
... Ohm said on 3/30/2006 @ 1:12 pm PT...


I'm still waiting for Coulter's beastiality pics to surface... and as for you, "OleCraftyLiberals".. November is coming. Shit like you are the real "terrists" in this country. And if I were you, I'd find a new tagline.. "liberals" went out in the 80's, kinda like that fuggin' mullet you still wear.


COMMENT #4 [Permalink]
... jack said on 3/30/2006 @ 1:13 pm PT...


With regard to the palm-beach county record, there are a few things to keep in mind:

There are probably other factors as well that could affect this situation. Property Tax records may not be the way to accurately define residency for voting in all situations.

1) Classifying a property as your homestead for tax purposes does NOT require you live there most of the time. In many states, the homestead claim can remain valid as long as you spend xx days or weeks at the residence. That's one way a President can live in the Whitehouse and still claim as his homestead the property in the town he came from, if he so desires. Many Presidents do that, and by "vacationing" to their home/ranch, fulfill the homestead TAX claim requirements.

2) In some states, TAX classification appears to be a matter of declaring in an affidavit that you don't intend to sell the home...but that you plan to live/retire there, etc.

3) The palm-beach TAX record may not reflect real-time homestead claim status. The record was for 2005 and the claim simply carried over to 2006 tax year. If it was valid for any portion of the 2006 tax year, then it's sometimes considered legally valid for the entire TAX year in some states, even if the residence situation changes.


COMMENT #5 [Permalink]
... onyx said on 3/30/2006 @ 1:24 pm PT...


The tax records would only show that it OWNED the property! They may not shed any light on whether or not it RESIDED there.

Conservatives (the ones that haven't already stopped supporting Bush) are so stupid. It's no wonder they haven't caught on to the criminality yet.


COMMENT #6 [Permalink]
... OleCraftyLiberals said on 3/30/2006 @ 1:31 pm PT...


Okay, so if the property tax record does not confirm it to the fullest extent (and if liberals were really that bright to at least obtain it - to date it has not surfaced anywhere on any liberal blog - they would have a place to start).

SO someone is going to pay 1.8 million dollars for the purposes of strictly OWNING without residing.

Hey, be careful Onyx that statement almost defends Coulter differenciating "residing" and "owning".

Hey are you her defense attorney?

LOL.

Catching onto the criminality is a liberal myth with convoluted conspiracy theories for back up.

We conservatives have presidential elections on our side, and Congresisonal elections for that matter, and most Governors are Republican (ya know solid things) on our side.

So there, I gave you your first piece of proof, fax it to the Florida state's attorney's office, give them a head start. You nitwits don't seem to be getting the point here...LOL.


COMMENT #7 [Permalink]
... craig3410 said on 3/30/2006 @ 1:48 pm PT...


"SO someone is going to pay 1.8 million dollars for the purposes of strictly OWNING without residing."

Uh, yeah; it's called a summer home.

You're a Republican; you should know that.


COMMENT #8 [Permalink]
... KestrelBrighteyes said on 3/30/2006 @ 1:48 pm PT...


Okay, let's lay this out:

Ann Counter fills out the address line on her voter registration, and signs the line where it says, "I declare under penalty of law that the above statements are true"

Then the person who really lives at that address says, "No, she doesn't live here, in fact she has NEVER lived here."

Now why on earth would that person lie?

Oh, I know - she must be a "librul"

*laughin*

No worries - Coulter has 30 days to prove she didn't break the law - and I'm sure those who say it's "no problem" for her to do so will come back here to admit they were wrong if she can't do it - right?

Just like they always do.

Right?

:-)

Oh wait....nevermind.


COMMENT #9 [Permalink]
... bvac said on 3/30/2006 @ 1:55 pm PT...


Good Ol' Mann Coulter...

Vote early, vote often!


COMMENT #10 [Permalink]
... OleCraftyLiberals said on 3/30/2006 @ 2:00 pm PT...


lol #8. What have conservatives been wrong about? What has been proven here or by any other blog site that conservatives have ran from.

I just gave you proof of Coulter's residence if Palm Beach County Florida. Liberals are still attacking me.

What I am saying (if you can comprehend) is that liberals generally have a way of turning a "story" into a conviction. I's simply saying if the voting precinct's officers are trying to make a case of residence, that the damn property tax bill was right there online for them, if indeed they thought they had any evidence whatsoever.

It's apparent that there is more to it than proving residence or ownership of Palm Beach property. Liberals complicate it in the beginning strictly for the purposes of hulabaloo.

I'm guessing that the day she ran out of the polling center is a day she was in a hurry. It's not like she had something to gain or lose by voting in a precinct that she didn't live in. Why would anybody get a thrill by voting in their next town over. Sounds kinda stupid doesn't it?

Moreover, why are liberals running with this with such venom? Are liberals obessed with Coulter...rumor had it there was a book in circulation exposing every Coulter lie and demon....we are still waiting for it.

LOL.


COMMENT #11 [Permalink]
... Ohm said on 3/30/2006 @ 2:14 pm PT...


What do you expect when people are rewarded for lying, cheating, raping, killing, etc.. all in the name of Christianity. When ignorant, uneducated people have nothing else to fall back on, out comes the "liberal" tag. Well, I have some news for you, Einstein.. it doesn't work. As long as you can keep your gun and your trailer, and ChinaMart can sell you enough crap to fill it with, you'll vote for whom ever the TV preacher-man tells you to vote for. It's amazing how the truth is overlooked, even when you are choking on it. This is what happens when every electronic device you own is tuned to FauxNews. It's sad, really, and I feel sorry for your ignorance.


COMMENT #12 [Permalink]
... just shut up said on 3/30/2006 @ 2:25 pm PT...


"ol #8. What have conservatives been wrong about? What has been proven here or by any other blog site that conservatives have ran from.

I just gave you proof of Coulter's residence if Palm Beach County Florida. Liberals are still attacking me.

What I am saying (if you can comprehend) is that liberals generally have a way of turning a "story" into a conviction. I's simply saying if the voting precinct's officers are trying to make a case of residence, that the damn property tax bill was right there online for them, if indeed they thought they had any evidence whatsoever.

It's apparent that there is more to it than proving residence or ownership of Palm Beach property. Liberals complicate it in the beginning strictly for the purposes of hulabaloo.

I'm guessing that the day she ran out of the polling center is a day she was in a hurry. It's not like she had something to gain or lose by voting in a precinct that she didn't live in. Why would anybody get a thrill by voting in their next town over. Sounds kinda stupid doesn't it?

Moreover, why are liberals running with this with such venom? Are liberals obessed with Coulter...rumor had it there was a book in circulation exposing every Coulter lie and demon....we are still waiting for it."

#1
in the words of your master, big dick cheney, "go fuck yourself"

#2
shut up 'n go take yer gun 'n' bible to Eye-Rack 'n' FIGHT.
FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT. Fight fer yer freeeedom. ha haha


COMMENT #13 [Permalink]
... Peg C said on 3/30/2006 @ 2:40 pm PT...


OleCraftyLiberals aka JustShutUp -

I believe it is against the rules to post under two different names on this blog. Brad is tolerant but not infinitely so.


COMMENT #14 [Permalink]
... Peg C said on 3/30/2006 @ 2:42 pm PT...


Oh, my mistake. Sorry, JSU - I just noticed the quotation marks. I must be going blind!


COMMENT #15 [Permalink]
... KestrelBrighteyes said on 3/30/2006 @ 2:55 pm PT...


OldCraftyLiberals re: #6, #10 and #12 (whose last comments will probably be deleted for breaking the rules about posting under two different names, among other things)

Pay attention now Scooter, and try to keep up.

YOU are saying she lives at the Seabreeze residence in Palm Beach county.

SHE's been saying she doesn't live there.

She DID, however, try to VOTE there - but left when asked to correct the record, and didn't vote.

Instead, she went to another polling place and voted in the precint for residents who live on Indian Road.

And the person who really DOES live at the residence says she doesn't live there.

Got that? Now stay with me.

So either she lives on Seabreeze, but signed a legal statement giving false information about living on Indian Road, and then cast her vote based on that information -

OR,

She really lives at the Indian Road address, and the person who legally owns and resides in the home is lying.

So which is it?


COMMENT #16 [Permalink]
... KestrelBrighteyes said on 3/30/2006 @ 2:57 pm PT...


Aw hell Peg, I did the exact same thing *laughin*

sorry JustShutUp.

It's been a looong day.


COMMENT #17 [Permalink]
... Dynamo Hum said on 3/30/2006 @ 3:29 pm PT...


I am glad to see Ann Coulter in hot water. It couldn't happen to a nicer guy.


COMMENT #18 [Permalink]
... Bob Alford said on 3/30/2006 @ 3:52 pm PT...


Ann Coulter appears to behave like an over-the-hill aging Jewish Princess. Is she a Jewess?


COMMENT #19 [Permalink]
... andto think i thought she was hot said on 3/30/2006 @ 3:55 pm PT...


Ann Coulter was previously known as "Arthur Coltrane of Pickens County, Georgia, former scion of an old Southern hog-farming family, before his sex-change operation," according to TBR News.


COMMENT #20 [Permalink]
... KestrelBrighteyes said on 3/30/2006 @ 4:11 pm PT...


OldCraftyLiberals

As for why we're enjoying this - I think it's common human nature to enjoy watching the bad guys get caught, don't you agree? And it's especially satisfying when it's someone who claims over and over to be a Christian and then says and does evil, hateful things. She hurts people, and I'm not just talking about her verbal attacks - she has actually put people in danger because of her stupidity and vindictiveness.

And I'm sure that the reason the Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections didn't rely just on tax records (which were found by SEVERAL people already, btw, and which was probably one of the reasons he sent a registered letter asking her to prove her residence) is that he's making sure he has enough concrete evidence to prove felony fraud beyond a shadow of a doubt before referring to it to the State Attorney General.

As for your comments - I don't see any conspiracy here, I just see a person committing a felony by giving a phony address on legal documents, then voting illegally. *shrugs*


COMMENT #21 [Permalink]
... wiley post said on 3/30/2006 @ 4:20 pm PT...


If Smoldering Coulter says she doesn't live in Palm Beach then she lives in NYC or CT and should not be voting in FL. Get it? You can't just buy a country house and say--Well, I have property here so I guess I'll vote here too. Throw water on her. She's melting and the Wicked Witch is dead!


COMMENT #22 [Permalink]
... OldCraftyLiberals said on 3/30/2006 @ 4:31 pm PT...


Posting under multiple names is silly. Yet I was accused of it twice. Talk about conspiracy theories.

Okay....the allegation is not that she voted in Palm Beach itself and shouldn't have been allowed to. The allegation is that she voted on the wrong side of town. There are different precincts in larger towns.

Probably to keep liberal stalkers away, Ann Coulter gave an address at a different location to not have her actual home (Seabreeze Avenue) become public. Aside from the link to the Palm Beach County's website showing her name and property, most people would not care to look it up, but for hullabaloo reasons.

If she gave the address of her realtor so that the public would think that her factual address was somewhere else, then so be it. If it is illegal, then the Florida's states attornies will decide. (Though if I were you I would not be putting $$$ on them doing so).

How many people do you know that give false addresses so that their kids can go to a better school three towns over? Or Residents of South Central Los Angeles who do it, or Chicago's Cabrini Green that do this. Of course liberals will defend that position. But when Ann Coulter does it to preserve privacy, they demand a hanging! LOL.

However, if it's a crime, and if it is punishable, then fine. But, until then I wouldn't file this under "Republican Corruption". If you would defend higher income families in suburbia to block inner city kids from going to their high schools by way of false address I think we would be on the same page. But I tell ya right now, most liberals would not.


COMMENT #23 [Permalink]
... bvac said on 3/30/2006 @ 4:56 pm PT...


Ol' Crafty..

Do you see the irony that "voter fraud", that is people voting improperly (more than once, in different locations than they are supposed to, under other peoples names, et c.), is the anchor of the far-rights election reform argument - and lo and behold, Ann Coulter allegedly did exactly that?

Talk about 'conspiracy theories'! The far-right believes that angry liburals around the country are conspiring to stuff ballot boxes with hundreds of fraudulent votes, put on a fake mustache and stuff them with even more votes, and get hundreds of their illegal alien friends to vote under fake names! - And that is why we must have photo ID, a drivers license, thumb print, bioscan, and national ID card just to vote! While in reality, the type of voter fraud allegedly committed by Mann Coulter is just an isolated case - the real threat to election integrity being voting machines that can lose track of votes and malfunction, corrupting the election process from the top down.


COMMENT #24 [Permalink]
... thecoolmacdude said on 3/30/2006 @ 5:16 pm PT...


OleCraftyLiberals (#10): EVERYTHING!


COMMENT #25 [Permalink]
... Bluebear2 said on 3/30/2006 @ 5:22 pm PT...


bvac #9,

Once again you've made me ill!


COMMENT #26 [Permalink]
... Mark said on 3/30/2006 @ 5:52 pm PT...


Politics has gotten out of hand today. The same people on TV calling everyone idiots and criminals, are the same ones committing the crimes. Then its people like oldcraftyliberal who stand by them just because they are in the same party... If it was some black guy who voted in the wrong county, he'd be feathered already but since its Ann Coulter, a hypocrit, she's allowed to explain herself... go figure


COMMENT #27 [Permalink]
... OldCraftyLiberals said on 3/30/2006 @ 6:42 pm PT...


BVAC, you are trying to make a case of conservative hypocrisy with the "alleged" screaming of conservatives that allege voter fraud with liberals stuffing ballot boxes. Honestly, I have said nothing like that, and to the contrary it seems to be liberals that are alleging the voter fraud. Of course they haven't won an election in sometime, so I cannot say as I blame them as creating this as their strategy for clearing by the big old mystery of why they have been unsuccessful at presidential elections. If your side stops harping in masses about it, then I'll inform the 5 Republicans that are alleging it on your side. Is it a deal?

Mark, everyone in this country is allowed to explain themselves. Here in this case, we are talking about a woman (who liberals just happen to hate) who voted in a different precinct that she should have. This thing (just because it's Ann Coulter) has gotten so out of hand that everyone on here seems to disregard the fact that newspaper articles simply say that she voted in a wrong district. Cities have multiple precincts and districts, if you are trying to prove that she voted more than once in the same precinct, or trying to prove that she voted in 2 precincts, then yes I can understand the carping. However, you and I both know that if this was an everyday "black man" or a white man even, it wouldn't even be on the news!!!

So to clarify, there should not be a double standard if Coulter is proven to have intentionally committed a crime. #1 that it even was a crime and #2 that there was intent to manipulate the outcome. If it were a black man and both points proved probable in his case, I would absolutely support his right to explain himself.

Don't make allegations against me because I'm looking from a different perspective. But then again, your peeps make allegations alot, so I should be used to it by now.


COMMENT #28 [Permalink]
... Annangrybitch said on 3/30/2006 @ 6:46 pm PT...


Ah yeah, Ann-Hole-Coulter, another RIGHT WING NUT screaming "I diden't do it" like Delay / Kenny boy Lay and the DUKE, YEAH RIGHT, Rush dosen't doctor shop for his high either,...... Ha !

You know why these A-Holes are rich, because even more stupid A-Holes support them !

Wake up America, realize that the RIGHT WING NUTS are just that - NUTS and doing it on your dime !


COMMENT #29 [Permalink]
... onyx said on 3/30/2006 @ 7:02 pm PT...


Stop dumping on OldCrafty. I feel bad that I did. He's over his head here. Be kind.


COMMENT #30 [Permalink]
... JUDGE OF JUDGES said on 3/30/2006 @ 7:07 pm PT...


Note: Code Words Being Used "oldcraftyliberals" Means those . . . . . Liberal Jews.


COMMENT #31 [Permalink]
... big dan said on 3/30/2006 @ 7:13 pm PT...


YEEEEEAAAAAHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ice to see you, BVAC...


COMMENT #32 [Permalink]
... big dan said on 3/30/2006 @ 7:17 pm PT...


oldcraftyliberals: "they haven't won an election in sometime"

No kidding! It's because of the e-vote machines you idiot! How do you explain the advent of GOP donor e-vote machines and the GOP takeover of our government and the exit polls consistently pointing out e-vote fraud? People like you are the problem! "Liberals" weren't screaming vote fraud when Reagan & Bush I won, because the exit polls coincided with the final count.


COMMENT #33 [Permalink]
... big dan said on 3/30/2006 @ 7:19 pm PT...


And Cheney's hunting accident. You mean, the one where the vice-president was drinking and shot someone in the face and the person who got shot apologized to Cheney? That one? YOU are bringing it up, not us! You have typical rightwing mentality. I wonder why people like you even post on blogs like this, I really wonder.


COMMENT #34 [Permalink]
... JUDGE OF JUDGES said on 3/30/2006 @ 7:23 pm PT...


I smell conservatives . . . . I hope they realize they are in The No Buuuuuuuuuuuuuuull Shit Zone.


COMMENT #35 [Permalink]
... bvac said on 3/30/2006 @ 7:24 pm PT...


BVAC, you are trying to make a case of conservative hypocrisy with the "alleged" screaming of conservatives that allege voter fraud with liberals stuffing ballot boxes. Honestly, I have said nothing like that, and to the contrary it seems to be liberals that are alleging the voter fraud. Of course they haven't won an election in sometime, so I cannot say as I blame them as creating this as their strategy for clearing by the big old mystery of why they have been unsuccessful at presidential elections. If your side stops harping in masses about it, then I'll inform the 5 Republicans that are alleging it on your side. Is it a deal?

Ol' Crafty Lib

I never said you personally made the claim. It's groups like the phony voting-rights group ACVR that make wild claims of massive fraud perpetrated by individual voters. There is nothing "alleged" about the fact that the tactic of right-wing groups is to tighten up individual voting rights to the point of disenfranchisement, instead of addressing the crucial problem of unreliable voting machines, each of which controls hundreds or even thousands of votes.

These election advocates, or 'liberals' as your brain can only comprehend, do not scream and shout about 'voter fraud'. It's called 'election fraud'. As in, the process is corrupted not by individual voters, but by the electoral 'machinery' so to speak. Electronic voting machines are systemically flawed and threaten the process from the top down.

I'm sorry you can't see the irony in a right-winger, who would otherwise freak out if this happened to an elderly black woman in Florida, allegedly committing voter fraud. I'm also sorry that your brain cannot cope with nuance and ambiguity and must divide important issues into "left" and "right". This stuff isn't about democrats and republicans, conservative and liberal, it's about the foundation of our electoral process crumbling away because of incompetent programmers and crappy machines.

Lastly, I find it amusing that you think this is some kind of democratic strategy. Like, I don't know, gay marriage ballot initiatives?


COMMENT #36 [Permalink]
... big dan said on 3/30/2006 @ 7:26 pm PT...


COMMENT #37 [Permalink]
... big dan said on 3/30/2006 @ 7:32 pm PT...


We're forgetting, this dude is fighting for a hatemonger who calls arabs "ragheads", and jokes about murdering Bill Clinton. This shows his makeup. Defending this hatemonger and liar. And he's an idiot, because Colter is just using these people to make money, she doesn't care about them. Hate sells with people like this. That's why she commands top dollar to pitch hate speeches at conservative conventions. It get's all their blood flowing, all her hate speech. Like a lynch-mob.


COMMENT #38 [Permalink]
... OldCraftyLiberals said on 3/30/2006 @ 7:34 pm PT...


"I wonder why people like you even post on blogs like this, I really wonder."

To lament on the major cult factor in these parts. To remind those so sucked in by it that there is non-conspitatorial common ground. EVEN to remind the opposition that spending time on Ann Coulter voting on the wrong side of town isn't going to do much for election results for their party.

You think America's "heartland" cares about issues like this enough to win you an election?

So yes, normal individuals who live in the real world can come on blogs to check out the hype and converse with those so deep in their own crap that it would take a 2 ton caterpillar lift to get them out. - frankly because it's fun.

Fun to show how one different perspective can tap into so much rage. (or is this the accepting liberal love we keep hearing about?)

Tell me, do you blather this way in normal everyday life? At work, in social groups? I can see why you are so possessive of a blog.


COMMENT #39 [Permalink]
... JUDGE OF JUDGES said on 3/30/2006 @ 7:55 pm PT...


Ann coulter is a one man Freak Show . . . . . and everybody likes a Freak Show . . . . . It's A MAN, Baby!


COMMENT #40 [Permalink]
... bvac said on 3/30/2006 @ 7:59 pm PT...


Ol' Crafty,

You're a piece of work alright. I'm really, really sorry you can't handle the irony of the situation. You're freaking out over this post by Brad more than anyone else here, and I'm starting to worry. Just let the grown ups handle things like election integrity. A citizenry that wishes to be both ignorant and free wants what never was, and what will never be. Take THAT to the "heartland".

I ask, when coworkers are gathered at the watercooler, do you butt in and say "Hey fellas! Ain't those liburals such wacky bitter moonbats!? Why don't they just quit whining and enjoy the freedoms that our Leader George Bush provides for them?!"

Heh. Major cult factor. Priceless.


COMMENT #41 [Permalink]
... JUDGE OF JUDGES said on 3/30/2006 @ 8:14 pm PT...


It's much more fun to talk to Goats than most righties . . .


COMMENT #42 [Permalink]
... OldCraftyLiberals said on 3/30/2006 @ 8:24 pm PT...


Hey BVAC. Are you sure you read all my posts? I'm not freaking out over this because I know that nothing is going to happen to Coulter for this (I wouldn't be freaking out even if it was).

It's just fun trying to understand the opposition.

What's confusing to me is the concept of how "certain" Americans seemed to be overwhelmed with the presumption of innocence when it comes to The Patriot Act or when it comes to terror suspects at Gitmo or when it comes to listening to cell phone conversations of men who want to blow up the Brooklyn Bridge.

BUT IN THE CASE OF ANN COULTER VOTING ON THE WRONG SIDE OF TOWN..............lol.

Okay........it was fun, I'll let ya have your floor back :-) .


COMMENT #43 [Permalink]
... OldCraftyLiberals said on 3/30/2006 @ 8:26 pm PT...


Correction: Certain Americans seem to overwhelmed with CONCERN for the presumption of innocence.


COMMENT #44 [Permalink]
... bvac said on 3/30/2006 @ 8:32 pm PT...


Ol' Crafty craft,

You're "freaking out" over this by making such a BIG DEAL about it. You're trying to make it seem like people are frothing at the mouth over this, when you were so quick to jump all over this thread that you got the #2 comment in. Try focusing on the real issues here, which I addressed in my posts but you conveniently ignored, instead of this amusing side-story.

Why you "oppose" secure elections is beyond me, but at least attempt to think beyond right and left.


COMMENT #45 [Permalink]
... Stan Russell said on 3/30/2006 @ 9:45 pm PT...


You people, the anti-Coulter's are desperate. Did she register in more than ane precinct, did she vote more than once?

I used to move frequently and if an election came before I changed my registeration, I simply went to my old precinct, to vote. I was never called to task on this, guess, I was a bad, bad,bad felon and didn't know it.

You Liberals remind me of a bunch of retarted monkeys running around looking up dead horses asses trying find things that aren't. You would be funny if it were not such a serious matter

Wish you would get rid of all your hate and contribute something worthwhile instead of always trying to tear down.


COMMENT #46 [Permalink]
... bvac said on 3/30/2006 @ 9:53 pm PT...


Stan,

Someone oughta put poison in your creme bulee.


COMMENT #47 [Permalink]
... lenny said on 3/30/2006 @ 11:46 pm PT...


When was the last time a Black male was allowed thirty days to explain away a felony?


COMMENT #48 [Permalink]
... World Facts said on 3/31/2006 @ 1:26 am PT...


Lets get down to the bottom line here.

Ann Coulter committed a felony and voted outside of the actual required voting district. If she can't even prove her residency there, then there is no story here. She'll be convicted aka fined.

If she can, then this will become an interesting case. It sure gives new meaning to the word "think before you leap"!!!!! Apparently all the real neocons are concerned about this roughing up Coulter, because it will.

This is a game aka a contest: We are the winners, those who stand for justice.

World Facts


COMMENT #49 [Permalink]
... Lori said on 3/31/2006 @ 2:42 am PT...


How come people defending Coulter never address the fact that he is really a man in disguise?


COMMENT #50 [Permalink]
... Dredd said on 3/31/2006 @ 5:39 am PT...


Senate Hearing on Censure of Bush

WHEN

Friday, Mar. 31, 2006
9:30 a.m. (Eastern Time I think)

Committee

Judiciary

Agenda

To hold hearings
to examine the call to censure
the President.

SH-216


COMMENT #51 [Permalink]
... gr8fully said on 3/31/2006 @ 6:15 am PT...


"You Liberals remind me of a bunch of retarted monkeys running around looking up dead horses asses trying find things that aren't. You would be funny if it were not such a serious matter

Wish you would get rid of all your hate and contribute something worthwhile instead of always trying to tear down."

Stan, you suck, but seriously can you tell me one thing the current administration has done right? Just one......didn't think so, pardon some of us for wanting our presidents elected and not selected, and for wanting elections where the actual votes are counted, conservative right wing nuts have ruined america, fuck them all


COMMENT #52 [Permalink]
... roooth said on 3/31/2006 @ 6:41 am PT...


Not to be snarky, but does Ann have a girlfriend???
http://www.corcoran.com/...d=SFRISBIE&region=FL


COMMENT #53 [Permalink]
... rickrocket said on 3/31/2006 @ 6:58 am PT...


#45 - Stan Russell, if you are going to call someone retarded, you probably want to spell "retarted" correctly. Also, who is trying to tear down anything? Upholding the law used to be a virtue in this country, but those who are above the law (Big Oil, Big Lobbying, Big Republican Hate-Mongers) seem to think they are exempt. If you really want to be a patriot to your country and do the right thing, OPEN YOUR EYES. Put down your bible and pick up the constitution. READ IT! Its contents actually exist. See what you are entitled to in this world, and how your government is taking that away from you with your own consent. Ann Coulter is a blight on our country, and the fact that some people would actually defend her in any way just shows the level of brainwashing propaganda that has actually stuck in our society.


COMMENT #54 [Permalink]
... Audrey said on 3/31/2006 @ 7:03 am PT...


#45 Stan,
"Retarted monkeys"? Last time I looked, the word was spelled "retarded". Which one are you, retarted or retarded?


COMMENT #55 [Permalink]
... Cynic said on 3/31/2006 @ 7:05 am PT...


@stan #45:

What you "used" to do is no longer acceptable, due to laws pushed by conservative activists. In many states, you need more than one form of ID, including a state-issued photo ID, in order to vote.

You know that "personal responsibility" thing that conservatives love to blovate about? Ms. Coulter should take some of it and quit making excuses for herself. Whatever her motives might have been, the law is the law.


COMMENT #56 [Permalink]
... OleCraftyLiberals said on 3/31/2006 @ 7:35 am PT...


"How come people defending Coulter never address the fact that he is really a man in disguise?"

"Not to be snarky, but does Ann have a girlfriend???"

Should it matter than Ann is a tranny? Or a lesbian?

Liberals go around portraying themselves as the party of acceptance, but when it better suits their agenda they will shine the BIGGEST spotlight of shame onto the gay and transgendered community - AS LONG as it better attacks Ann Coulter.

The "Convenience" party strikes again! But that darm evil Ann Coulter voted on the wrong side of the tracks! Darn her.

With this stunning new "development" I managed to sleep pretty good last night....LOL


COMMENT #57 [Permalink]
... paula said on 3/31/2006 @ 7:49 am PT...


ann coulter is registered to vote in ct. i am trying to get this info to brad


COMMENT #58 [Permalink]
... Timmy said on 3/31/2006 @ 9:05 am PT...


OLECRAFTY,

Just like a conservative, drag the debate down into the muck, then cry when you get dirty. This is I believe page 7 of the KKKarl Rove handbook on conservative political discourse.

Mann Coulter is an expert at this technique, so stop apologizing for her in your condescending, pseudo-educated way.

She has made a career out of attacking and abusing AMERICANS with left-leaning views on multiple issues. If you can't see how that might persuade some folks to take a sharper view of her and incline them to abuse her right back...I'm not surprised at all.


COMMENT #59 [Permalink]
... big dan said on 3/31/2006 @ 9:08 am PT...


OldCraftyLiberals: Perhaps you're mistakenly on the wrong site. You should be on Rush Limbaugh's site.


COMMENT #60 [Permalink]
... big dan said on 3/31/2006 @ 9:11 am PT...


I don't give a crap about Ann Coulter. If she's on TV, I turn the channel...if her column is in the newspaper, I don't read it.

But I am interested in a source reporting her hypocrisy.

She's a hatemongering rightwing neo-con (not a conservative), and anyone who defends her has problems. This is very simple: OldCraftyLiberal---you've got problems! Case closed! Go to Rush Lim-BOOB's site.


COMMENT #61 [Permalink]
... Audrey said on 3/31/2006 @ 9:15 am PT...


This is what Ann Coulter said in her Nov 10, 2000 column about the elderly having difficulty with their butterfly ballots in Florida.
"I love those jackasses claiming they meant to vote for Al Gore but - whoops - slipped and pulled the lever for Buchanen instead! Oh really. Let's pretend that's true. Sorry, but that's one of the disabilities of being a political party that preys on the stupid. Sometimes your "base" forgets it's Election Day, too. Live by demagoguing to the feeble-minded, die by demagoguing to the feeble-minded."
Now do we get to call Ann Coulter a jackass and stupid and feeble-minded?
By the way, OLECRAPPY, better lay off the laughing gas, it's affecting your mind.


COMMENT #62 [Permalink]
... KestrelBrighteyes said on 3/31/2006 @ 9:33 am PT...


OldCraftyLiberal -

Okay, we get it - you don't think that committing fraud, a felony that is punishable by up to a $5,000 fine and 5 years in jail, is any big deal.

I'm sure your argument of "she just voted on the wrong side of the tracks" will hold up in court. I'm sure the judge will just look at her and say, "Oh well, that's different then - nevermind" In fact, you might want to go ahead and get your "congratulations" letter ready to send to Coulter as soon as this is over. (I wouldn't mail it yet though - she's got too many addresses already, and if this DOES involve more than one state as it's starting to appear, there's no telling WHERE she'll be residing after it goes through the courts)

And we get that no matter how simply we try to put it, you just can't comprehend the irony that the person who committed fraud is someone who's been raving about people she alleges committed fraud. That's okay dear, just don't think about it - some things are just above your ability to comprehend.

Now, just try to stay out of the way while we take care of the problems with elections in this country. You can read about it in the papers when it's over.

And you're welcome.

Everybody else - Think Ann Coulter will smile in her mugshot like Tom Delay? Maybe she should borrow Jack Abramoff's Fedora, or Martha Stewart's poncho....


COMMENT #63 [Permalink]
... Dredd said on 3/31/2006 @ 9:53 am PT...


Another republican, like Coulter, denied everything screaming out righteous indignation ... right up to the time of pleading guilty:

"Tony Rudy, a former top aide to Rep. Tom DeLay, has agreed to plead guilty to charges in the widening federal investigation of lobbyist fraud, a law enforcement official said Friday" (link here).

Yep, Rush was a drug addict while condemning drug addicts, and commits felonies while condemning felonies ... its the way of corruption.


COMMENT #64 [Permalink]
... KestrelBrighteyes said on 3/31/2006 @ 10:04 am PT...


I'd love for someone to ask Ann Counter why she voted at all, ESPECIALLY given the legal issues surrounding her legal residence.

After all, she's said several times that women aren't as bright as men, and shouldn't have the right to vote. Why did she risk prison to do what she thinks she shouldn't be allowed to do anyway?

Ya know, I can't imagine willingly diminishing and disparaging my own gender the way she does. It's sad and twisted. Maybe the prison psychologist can get at the root of her self-loathing and help her turn around the legacy of hate that has become analogous with the name "Ann Coulter"

This could, in the long run, be the best thing that's ever happened to her.

Of course, she'll lose a lot of fans if she doesn't feed the hate, so, maybe not.


COMMENT #65 [Permalink]
... james said on 3/31/2006 @ 1:13 pm PT...


:P i dont care i would still fuck her skinny ass

from da back side :crazy: :laugh:


COMMENT #66 [Permalink]
... sd;glvjn; said on 3/31/2006 @ 1:19 pm PT...


anyone who has a cindy shehand link on there site is a raveing lunatic move out of yalls parents hose and get a life


COMMENT #67 [Permalink]
... Brad said on 3/31/2006 @ 1:51 pm PT...


OleCraftyLiberal contained to display his keen lack of knowledge or education on this matter by asserting:

BVAC, you are trying to make a case of conservative hypocrisy with the "alleged" screaming of conservatives that allege voter fraud with liberals stuffing ballot boxes. Honestly, I have said nothing like that, and to