Blogged by Brad Friedman on 4/2/2006 11:51PM  

This is freakin' brilliant: "Chevy's 'Make Your Own Tahoe Commercial' idea not exactly going as planned".

Too funny.

(Hat tip to Huff Po...and another BRAD BLOG reader who tried to point me to these earlier, but whose name I've forgotten. With apologies.)

Buzz this story! C2NN: Submit it!


READER COMMENTS ON
"What the Hell was Chevy Thinking?"
(21 Responses so far...)

COMMENT #1 [Permalink]
... agent99 said on 4/3/2006 @ 1:10 am PT...


Heh. Whoever came up with this bright idea is, like, way, way so, fired.... :-)


COMMENT #2 [Permalink]
... Dredd said on 4/3/2006 @ 4:23 am PT...


Did anyone watch This Week on Sunday.

One past Secretary of Labor and others in a fairly agreed to discussion, talked about GM and the parts are parts part of GM which is in trouble financially.

If the parts thingy goes down GM is going to file bankruptcy. No choice.

The Secretary of Labor indicated that this will be the greatest bailout with your tax dollars, since the Savings and Loan debacle of the late 80's and early 90's.

I honestly think, sometimes, that there is a deliberate movement by this regime to damage the economy so bad that many, many will be glad to join the military.


COMMENT #3 [Permalink]
... Citizen663 said on 4/3/2006 @ 4:45 am PT...


How to save this?
After loading and viewing the page, look into your temporary internet files for a .swf file. There may be many of them depending on how many sights you've visited with fash animation, but is should still be there. Particularly if you still have the page up.
You can open the .swf file with your browser to verify.


COMMENT #4 [Permalink]
... KestrelBrighteyes said on 4/3/2006 @ 4:46 am PT...


The original commercial that was at the link I posted as an "off topic" in the "Sequoia found hackable in PA" thread was taken down the next day. However...

I put the link on Bradblog the same night I sent it out to my "radical and rebel homeschoolers and friends" list. Someone on that list said we should keep cranking out commercials to replace them as fast as they disappeared.

I think a lot of other people had the same idea.

:-) Poor Chevy - wish I'd been a fly on the wall in the meeting following THAT "aw s**t" moment.


COMMENT #5 [Permalink]
... Floridiot said on 4/3/2006 @ 5:03 am PT...


I guess mine would have read;
Instead of being in bed with Big Oil all those years and buying up energy efficient patents, why didn't we just use one of them ?


COMMENT #6 [Permalink]
... Robert Lockwood Mills said on 4/3/2006 @ 5:07 am PT...


Who says the current level of oil prices has to be the peak? Is that written somewhere?

This commercial looks to me like a tongue-in-cheek attempt to attract the viewer's attention. Nothing more or less than Madison Avenue innovation; futile maybe, but this kind of stuff has sometimes worked in the past.

I'm more concerned by the phrase "peak oil." If Wall Street thinks oil prices have peaked (I don't), they'll take stocks up from here and create a real 1990s-style bubble. When the Dow makes a new high, it will be the lead story...and with Bush and the G.O.P. in trouble politically, the media (which are corporate entities above all else) will milk the news for all it's worth.


COMMENT #7 [Permalink]
... KestrelBrighteyes said on 4/3/2006 @ 6:32 am PT...


I know there are some incredibly talented and creative people here - care to try your hand at making your OWN commercial?

Link

And PLEASE let us know when it's up.


COMMENT #8 [Permalink]
... GWN said on 4/3/2006 @ 7:22 am PT...


Thanks for the morning Brad and KBE. That was great.


COMMENT #9 [Permalink]
... sukabi said on 4/3/2006 @ 7:38 am PT...


Robert, I don't think the term "Peak Oil" is referring to the price - it's referring to the amount of available oil that can be pumped out of the ground with the current technology - with that in mind, there will never be a peak for the price of oil, it's only going to go up.


COMMENT #10 [Permalink]
... Mimi said on 4/3/2006 @ 8:20 am PT...


Here's mine. I chose to focus on the injury potential of SUV's.
http://www.chevyapprenti...e-1029-98eb-0013724ff5a7


COMMENT #11 [Permalink]
... JB said on 4/3/2006 @ 8:34 am PT...


Here's mine. A nasty negative selling campaign. I'm rather pleased with it.

http://www.chevyapprenti...e-1029-98eb-0013724ff5a7


COMMENT #12 [Permalink]
... Savantster said on 4/3/2006 @ 9:11 am PT...


sukabi is CORRECT.. RLM, "peak oil" has nothing to do with cost, and everything to do with reserves. The concept of "peak oil" is that we're now past the "mid point" of all the oil there was.. that is, we've used up 1/2 of all the oil, now we're on the back side of what there is left.

Given the demand on the remaining amount of oil, we're screwed. 1 billion indians and 1 billion chinese want to live "like Americans" now, but at 7% of the population, we were once using 50% of the worlds raw resources (down to like 45% now that we're not such an industrial base anymore). One of the major resources consumed now is oil.. and Inida and China (combined to be near 6 times as many people as in the U.S.) want "the good life" too.

I also found a site (howthingswork.com) that explained that running a 100 watt light bulb for a year consumes 2 tons of coal. We REALLY need to make a huge push toward renewable energy (and not crops that require oil to grow/harvest.. that defeats the purpose). I'm looking to get solar panels installed on my house. I can generate near 3Kw/hr and only use like 1.2 Kw/hour on average during the winter (2.5 during the hottest summer months with central air). The power company is PAYING me to put up the panels (rebates, but drastically reduces the cost), then will BUY electricity from me (what ever I generate FREE, but don't use for myself).

The technology has been out there for a LONG time. It's just not in the financial best interests of power companies or oil companies to refine those technologies. And our government has been giving EXACTLY the wrong people "tax dollars" to do the research. That is, we're paying oil/gas/power companies to burry tech that would help us.. nice, huh?


COMMENT #13 [Permalink]
... Dredd said on 4/3/2006 @ 9:25 am PT...


Sukabi #9 is correct RLM #6.

Peak oil is a term that means that the nonrenewable resource, petroleum, has a limited quantity.

A scientist, Hubbert, predicted the time when we would reach the peak amount of oil being brought from the earth, and from that time on the barrels per day would continually diminish.

He predicted it a decade before it happened in the US, and he predicted it for about the year 2000 for the world.

Once the world realizes this nonrenewable resource is an endangered species, all hell will break loose.

That is the theory and all fear aside, that is also the reality. Here is what the Army Corps of Engineers said:

Once worldwide petroleum production peaks, geopolitics and market economics will result in even more significant price increases and security risks. To guess where this is all going to take us is would be too speculative. Oil wars are certainly not out of the question” (link here, bold added).

There is debate as to how close he was on the 2000 year prediction (3-10 yrs either way), but not much on his prediction of 1970 as the year the US reached its peak oil mark (link here, and here).


COMMENT #14 [Permalink]
... Dredd said on 4/3/2006 @ 9:31 am PT...


Savantster #12

Did not know you had posted, or would not have repeated your points.


COMMENT #15 [Permalink]
... bv said on 4/3/2006 @ 10:46 am PT...


:D :laugh: lol


COMMENT #16 [Permalink]
... Robert Lockwood Mills said on 4/3/2006 @ 4:32 pm PT...


That certainly does change the meaning.


COMMENT #17 [Permalink]
... Brad said on 4/3/2006 @ 6:07 pm PT...


RLM - One additional point that the others didn't cover in reply to your note. You may not have read the article carefully enough. Those are created by CITIZENS, not by Chevy who simply gave folks the tools to make the videos you've probably seen by now.

Somehow, or another, Chevy (I guess) didn't realize what they were opening themselves up for there!

Mimi & JB - Enjoyed both of those muchly! :-) --- Thanks for sharing!


COMMENT #18 [Permalink]
... des said on 4/3/2006 @ 9:54 pm PT...


here's mine!

LINK


COMMENT #19 [Permalink]
... fouro said on 4/4/2006 @ 7:39 pm PT...


I see a more sunny approach, what with Iraq being a new "market" and all...

Introducing the 2006 Tahoe Baghdad XL


COMMENT #20 [Permalink]
... KestrelBrighteyes said on 4/5/2006 @ 6:04 am PT...


Hey y'all!

I heard this story was briefly covered on "Nightline" last night - anybody see it?

BTW, I've been checking out the ones y'all link here - VERY creative! *bfg*

For even more (and a chance to link yours to the "Chevy Carnival") - LINK

And there are a few more on youtube (do a video search on "chevy tahoe commercial")

I especially like "What Would Jesus Drive?"


COMMENT #21 [Permalink]
... Mimi said on 4/5/2006 @ 4:49 pm PT...


Thanks to all the various posts on this page, I've become a "chevy Tahoe Apprentice" addict!
Who knew that creating one of these a day would keep the doctor away! (Cathartic, freeing, and magical!)

More seriously--or less comically, I just mailed another check to Brad to keep this website running. Please join me in helping to keep the lights on in the Friedman home.


-=- Comments on this item are now closed. -=-


VotersUnite.org's Daily Voting News 'Daily Voting News'
For December 04, 2008

by John Gideon

The Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA) was signed into law in Oct. 2002. Amongst other things HAVA required the formation of the Election Assistance Commission (EAC) and provided some mandates, in Title III of the law, for federal elections including some standards for voting systems. Those standards include, but are not limited to, accessibility for voters with disabilities and accuracy in the vote count. Testing by experts in accessibility has shown that none of the Direct Recording Electronic (DRE, usually touch-screen) voting systems presently in use meet the requirements for accessibility for disabled voters. Failures in testing and vote counting in real elections have also proven that, at times, the voting systems presently being used across the country do not meet the federally mandated requirements for accuracy.

So what guidance has been provided by the EAC to the states with regards to Title III? Well, actually none. In fact even though voting systems presently in use do not meet federal law the EAC is just now getting around to issuing guidance to state and local election officials and, according to the draft of the plan ‘featured’ below, it is going to take another two years before the EAC can complete the guidance.

Why can’t they just tell the vendors and the states that the law is clear and, if they fail to follow that law, violations will be referred to the DoJ? The fact that the vendors misrepresent their products as being accessible is a clear violation of the law. It is time they are held responsible and it doesn’t take two years of studying Title III of HAVA to make that clear....

Click for links to all of today's notable voting news headlines...

Support The BRAD BLOG
Please visit our advertisers




Spend your advertising dollars wisely! And support the good guys at the same time! or Advertise with the good guys! We're it!



Fight the H8 in Your State











OTHER SITES
Groomsmen Gifts - Pub signs can be personalized for a unique gift for your wedding party.

Support The BRAD BLOG
Please visit our advertisers
Brad Friedman's
The BRAD BLOG



Go to front page...

Recent Entries

Archives
Important Docs
A Few Great Blogs
Political Cartoonists
Special Coverage Pages...
Touch-Screen Vote-Flipping 2008

L.A. County "Double Bubble" Debacle

2008 New Hampshire Primary Mess

Riverside CA, Sequoia Hack Challenge

Tom Feeney/Clint Curtis Voting Riggging Scandal
Summary...
Key Articles/Docs...
GOP ACORN 'Voter Fraud' Hoax

Ann Coulter's Voter Fraud Felony

Thor Hearne's 'American Center for Voting Rights'
GOP 'Voter Fraud' Scam

NM GOP/Rep. Heather Wilson 'Vote-Buying' Scandal

Rush Holt's Election Reform Bill (HR811)

'04 White House Website Scrubbing

· Make The BRAD BLOG your Homepage!
· Add The BRAD BLOG to favorites/bookmarks!
· Or syndicate The BRAD BLOG...
BRAD BLOG RSS 2.0 FEED
Add to My Yahoo! Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Add to My AOL
Add to Google

· Select a BRAD BLOG color scheme...

Dark on Light Classic BRAD BLOG
Please Help Support The BRAD BLOG...
One-time
any amount you like...
$
Monthly
any amount you like...
$
Or by Snail Mail
Make check out to...
Brad Friedman
7095 Hollywood Blvd., #594
Los Angeles, CA 90028

The BRAD BLOG receives no foundational or corporate support. Your contributions make it possible to continue our work.
About Brad Friedman...
· Bio & Testimonials
· Media Appearance Archive
· Articles & Editorials Elsewhere
· Contact

Additional Stuff...
Brad Blog Named...



Wikio - Top of the Blogs - Politics

The BRAD BLOG - Year in Review 2006
Part 1 - Part 2 - Part 3

Other Brad Related Places...
The BRAD SHOW On the Air! Via RAW RADIO!


Useful Tools...