Did anyone catch Hannity and Colmes last night? The video is at FoxNews.com.

I believe she addresses "certain" individuals over this voter fraud nonsense appropriately.

She asked Alan Colmes (a liberal) if he had been talking to her stalkers who knew her address and apartment number.

She also said that NONE of it was true. Guess we will find out.

I know, poor liberal bloggers try tactics and they get no attention. Ann Coulter makes statements and gets all kinds of attention, not only from liberal bloggers, but from John Kerry and most recently, Hillary Clinton! Check the news stories of how Hillary is "lashing out" at Coulter.

I also believe her book was number one at Amazon.com Now, I be willing to bet it has something to do with all this liberal attention she gets.

What do you think?

LOL! The Reichpublican's Coulter of Corruption!!

TTP.. are you implying with "She also said that NONE of it was true. Guess we will find out" that she didn't put 999 Indian Drive (or whatever) on her voter registration form and didn't take the $25k credit for the house in FL (not at 999 Indian Drive)? Cause, if that's what you're saying, you're saying Brad made it all up and faked all the docs.. or someone did, and gave them to Brad.

"I also believe her book was number one at Amazon.com"

Yep.. #1 at Amazon today.. and selling for 40% off the cover price.. Hmm.. perhaps most people who want the book understand that they can save a lot by waiting a few days for it over buying it at a book store? Also, note.. it has a 2.5/5 rating.. LOL.. And, further note.. #4 at Amazon was "Cesar's Way: The Natural, Everyday Guide to Understanding and Correcting Common Dog Problems [Deluxe Edition] [Large Print] " LOL.. good company for Ann..

Greg Palast's book was at #6 (one below where Ann was "yesterday", but has a 4/5 rating (same 40% off the cover.. I suppose Amazon has to find SOME way to stay in business).

#2 was a "never cold sell" book, a book for SALESMEN.. I recon, if you are gonna try and shovel Ann you'd have to be a salesman.. lol

"What do you think?"

I think she's an evil person. She's a hate-monger who spews filth at everyone she can to rustle up the troops (those psycho christian soldiers, don't ya know). She has no morals and no respect for humans in general. If the world were to lose all the people like her, and all the people who like/follow/listen to her tomorrow, we'd be VERY close to a eutopia. Alas, it's her and those who support her that cause all the ill in the world with their greed and hate and controll issues. Oh well, no chance there will be a virus anytime soon that only kills "evil people".. But I can dream, can't I?

Yes Savanster you can dream,Can I dream along with you? Pretty Please? I hope the activist judges Nail her ass to the wall. hehe

I dunno Savanster, looks like she might be on her way to her FIFTH massive New York Times bestseller.

You guys are such Ann stalkers and it's true. She has you responding just as she wants you to.

Getting a ton of media attention from Hillary Clinton and making Matt Lauer cry and then getting liberals' reactions to Lauer's interview, it seems to me liberals are eating their own.

When you don't pick up 50 seats in the House in the year that you should (this year) as the Republicans did in 1994 after having only one term of Democrats winning Congress (haven't Republicans been in power for 12 years now?) you can reflect back to your persuading arguments on voter fraud.

But hey, look on the bright side, when Democrats fudge it up for their representatives and their representatives wind up losing, you can keep yourself busy for another number of years alleging voter fraud again.

Will it be Ohio again? Luckily this great land contains fifty states. LOL.

God, the things that come out of this woman's mouth. It occurs to me (maybe because it's actually hard for me to believe that anyone is this deliberately evil) that MAYBE (and granted, this is also pretty vile) it's all just a "joke" to her. Anything to sell books, stay "famous" & talked about.
I dunno. I'm grabbin' at straws here, trying to understand how anybody can spew so much hateful crap.

The thing is, knowing how complicated legalese can be & how some people don't really read what they sign thoroughly enough, I'd probably DEFEND her, saying all this COULD POSSIBLY be an accident.

If she were not such a hate-spewing, vile, disgusting, venomous, lying bitch.

"It manipulates one into thinking they don't have to spend THEIR money to fix all the problems in the world, that they should spend YOUR money. Obviously, you aren't responsible enough with your own money to know how to properly spend it, and Coulter points this out, with plenty of examples."

From the ONE dissenting review for Greg's book... the same wackjob put up a glowing one for Ann.. Go figure (and he bitches about 'liberals didn't read her book and put up fake posts!!".. I'm pretty sure this schmuck didn't read Greg's book either.. why give some "liberal" more money when they don't want to spend it on fixing the planet, they just want.. um.. YOU, who ever that is, to do it..

Here's the problem TTP (and other Ann supporting degenerates).. Liberals, when they impose taxes on EVERYONE, ARE putting their OWN money into the pot to help "fix the world"..

And I'd sure like to know how " isn't esponsible enough with your own money to know how to properly spend it".. I mean, I get all my bills paid on time.. in fact, I went from bankruptcy (college debt that the CC companies said "we don't care if you can't eat, your circumstances aren't our problem".. so I said "then if you want to fuck up my credit before I've missed a single payment and I"m trying to explain that my life has just been turned up side down, then you can eat the debt.. morons".. and filed for bankruptcy as soon as I got my first job) to having a FICO of 700 in 5 years. I own a home, bought a new vehicle (the year after my bankruptcy), and am getting ALL my bills paid ON TIME.. I guess I don't get how "this liberal can't manage my own finances".. And, I took on the $40,000 of debt to get my degree on my own.. Mommy and Daddy didn't pay it for me, and I'm still paying on that debt (on time, responsibly.. hell, I was even paying it monthly when I was unemployed for 6 months).

You right-wing nutjobs aren't based in reality. You keep pretending like the only "liberals" are street people and welfare cases. The truth is, anyone that has REAL compassion and dislikes being taken advantage of by businesses is likely a LIBERAL.. But that flys in the face of your hate-mongering.. so you ignore it, and distort the truth to fit your own ends.

Truely pathetic.. and a waste of breath to say so. You wingnuts will never pull you heads out of your asses because you are stuck at the lowest level of instinct there is.. pure animal drive of selfish to the extreme. The only other animals on the planet that are as fucked up as you are Chimps and a few other apes who still wage war, rape, and kill for entertainment. Pretty much NO other animals on earth (liberals included) are that vile. Just Repblicans, Conservatives, and shit-flinging apes.. Congrats.

And Laura, PLEASE do dream with me.. perhaps if enough of us get that energy out into the univers, the great maker will honor our request and purge the evil and filth from our existence

TTP-

The pitiful thing about you is that you take such glee in throwing Coulter and the rest of the slime you support in the faces of those of us who are appalled by her and by the damage her supporters and this administration are doing to this country. She is a sociopath by any definition and it is NOT those of us who oppose and would never buy her crap that makes her the darling of the sick element that has taken over the Republican Party. It is people like you, who are bullies, just like her that give her the undeserved voice that she has in this country.

What kind of jerk does it take to need to go to sites like this where most people are expressing their heartfelt opinions, and then to gloat, like you do, about the sickest elements of a sick party that, by ANY means necessary has taken over this once great country. How about proving that you've got an ounce of dignity and self-control and going to some rightwing blogsite that will appreciate and even applaud your kind of pathology and where you can wallow in your largesse without poisoning the forums of those of us who have something real to say.

Ann WHO?

Who's Ann KKKoolter?

Please fill me in here people as to why she gets all the attention. No one says nice things about her.

Was she one of the losers on American Idol, or something? Really, now.

Where might Ann KKKoulter be if there was no T.V.?

I have no cable, and really haven't missed her.

Steve, the point, I think, is.. the kinds of people that laud Ann as some kind of hero are the exact problem in the world.

I think, that as time goes on, our world will be a better place as we find ways to prevent our children from becoming like these vile beasts. As we "liberals" find ways to get better education to more children, and find ways to make sure more people are raised in "loving homes", we will root out the disorders that afflict these poor lost souls. The irony that has Ann calling "liberalism a mental disease" is that it's pretty clear to rational people that Ann is the one that is out of touch, running on some broken track of 1/2 truths and delusion.

Here is a link to the guy I talked about above. Of note are the comments like "It just goes to show that liberals can't win, so they take their vitriol out on someone who is unable to defend themselves. A woman, no less.", yet Ann continously shows she CAN defend herself, and makes sure she attacks everyone she can every time she's in public. Couple that with the fact that she and the "religous right" want to restrict women's rights, and you have more irony with the 'defense of the poor defenseless woman'. I'd call that "deluded" in the sense that the belief clearly defies the fact.. Then you have "She knows liberals better than they know themselves.".. Ok, and on what authority does she "know" someone that is nothing like her? If she "knows" them, it implies some kind of empathy.. so, if she "knows" them and still feels they should be killed for.. well.. no good reason.. what does that say about her? And, I don't think -anyone- can actually say "they know someone else better than they know themselves", unless it's a specific individual and you've spent a lot of time studying them, and they are completely mentally incapable of functioning.

At the end of the day, these people who accuse "liberals" of having a "mental illness" exhibit many many classic symptoms of illness themselves. Ann's denying things that there is a paper trail for is an example. Her pontifications won't keep her out of jail..

Steve that was touching. The bottom line, is you guys act like mothers did in the 80's when Madonna wore lace panties on the outside of her pants everytime Ann Coulter makes a statement.

She gets the attention that liberals crave all the time. Her point is absolutely accurate about the 9/11 widows. One of these days, someone from your party is going to have to make a solid counterargument other than to say "this person is crazy or hateful or vulgar."

Hillary Clinton today showed us as well that was the max of her capacity to counter a point.

Savanster said:
"Laura, PLEASE do dream with me.. perhaps if enough of us get that energy out into the univers, the great maker will honor our request and purge the evil and filth from our existence "

I can see it now: Once Savanster is finally finished with one of his long rants, he and Laura can embrace and shed tears as John Lennon's "Imagine" slowly fades in.

Let me know when the swaying beings so that I can look away before wasting perfectly good puke.

"She gets the attention that liberals crave all the time."

I don't crave attention.. not at all.. and I'm very "liberal". Explain to me how your baseless assertion in an attempt to support your psychopath makes any sense?

"Her point is absolutely accurate about the 9/11 widows. One of these days, someone from your party is going to have to make a solid counterargument"

Of course, you are content to ignore the fact that there are "9/11 widows" who support Shrubby, and do the SAME thing Ann (and you) complain about from the "democratic widows".. Fact, not something wing-nuts are big on. Delusion! now, that you got tons of!

"Hillary Clinton today showed us as well that was the max of her capacity to counter a point."

and no self-respecting Democrat likes "Hillary Clinton".. she's a hack, a Republicrat and one of the worst kinds. Problem is, there are a lot of Dems out there who don't see it.. who are stuck in the same world as you Pugs... the one where "party is first".. Personally, I can't stand those kinds of Dems either. I have no respect for a woman who doesn't stand up for herself.. and when Bill got his hummer and drug the family into the spotlight, she should have left him for his moral weakness, and on the priciple of "you don't get to shame me".. At least, that's my opinion. I've never cheated, and never will .. and I have NO respect for anyone that cheats, or anyone that's not strong enough to leave a cheater. If you can't look out for yourself, how can you look out for anyone else? Note, a goodly number of self rightous, self absorbed, arrogant, narcissistic right-wing types cheat regularly. Liberals, in my expierence, don't.. It happens, but a LOT less.. kind of like corruption of leaders..

"The bottom line, is you guys act like mothers did in the 80's when Madonna wore lace panties on the outside of her pants"

LOL.. and I thought it was the CONSERVATIVES who were acting like asses over that.. I know MY mom didn't seem to mind. I guess though, you didn't say "which mothers" and didn't really express your meaning.. Of course, that's the typical way, isn't it? leave it all open without comitting so you can weazle out later?

K.. done feeding the trolls.. Jon Stewart is on and the Tivo is about 1/2 way through.. I can watch without being innundated with comercials now.. Comercials is why I stopped watching TV live.. I was missing out on some entertaining stories before I got my Tivo.. glad it's so easy to pass the brain-washing of Corporate America (for now).

hey ttp ,If you don't like it here, what are you doing here? Nobody is forcing you to come here and act like an ass.. Leave, we'll all be better off not having to assimilate the Bullshit you are slinging. Thanks and you have a nice day! OH and by the way "Imagine" happens to be one of my favorite songs. Hey Savanster... Hug Hug

-tt-p-p- Thanks For being an example of what Liberal folks must Counter & Destroy . . . . . Literally & Figuratively . . .

"Of course, you are content to ignore the fact that there are "9/11 widows" who support Shrubby, and do the SAME thing Ann (and you) complain about from the "democratic widows".. Fact, not something wing-nuts are big on. Delusion! now, that you got tons of!"

No Savanster. Just like Cindy Sheehan....a woman by the name of Laura Youngblood spoke out recently about how she does support the war (even though she lost her husband) and some 9/11 widows have come forward as you have documented (clearly none of the as famous as the self-titled "Jersey Girls") BUT NOT to persuade liberals to turn conservative or to replace Conservative debate by imposing a political belief on you (a VERY liberal person as you said) and dare you to respond simply because they had a personal tragedy.

The left set this structure up, the women and other dissenters such as Sheehan's husband and entire family speak up to acknowledge the politicization of a personal tragedy.

Tucker Carlson, CNN, Matt Lauer, Bill O'Reilly (who thinks Coulter went too far this time - as he said last night on his program) and etc all blathering about it last night and today are raising the overpall point that Coulter was making so that it can be discussed. And it has been. Finally, a lot of people are crawling out and saying that Coulter's remarks minus the vitriol echo a lot of silent opinions on people like Sheehan and the 9/11 commission.

Whether or not some agree with these statements made, you have to admit it's been interesting watching Americans at least debate the main point and watch others come out to say if it was right or wrong for the left to put people up like Joe Wilson, Cindy Sheehan, or the 9/11 widows to make it hard for conservatives to respond to without being labeled as hateful or heartless.

TTP - Solid arguments re: Ann (and yourself). The rule of law matters. Or used to to both Ann, and I'm guessing, you. Not anymore as you apparently support criminals

(Before you tell me she hasn't been found guilty of anything, please keep in mind the case has been laid in front of you, with the documentation, so you can see it's airtight against here. On the other hand, when she called Bill Clinton a rapist and a felon, there was no trial).

One other solid argument. You're a horrible human if you feel "she's" right that the 9/11 widows rejoiced at their burning deaths of their husbands. Pathetic.

TO THE OTHERS: Please note Palast's AUDIO book (on which I'm told I am a reader and named on the cover) is #1 in the Amazon audio book section! As of yesterday anyway. Haven't looked today. Just sayin'

"So, Ann is some genius set out to enlighten the world?"

No, I said she was a mastermind at manipulating the media. I also said she is a conservative author with a huge stage to speak her views. Where's your link to support your quote and gross destortion of my words?

The point of Invade, Kill, and Convert strictly referred to the people written in the previous sentence of that same column - the ones cheering and dancing in the streets (extremists who celebrated 9/11). It did not include everyone Arab residing in the middle east as papers led you to believe. However; Ann was more than happy at the overstatement of that quote because it gave her attention!

I'm not asserting that she did or didn't do anything (I have actually left that for you to do as you did so well regarding the alleged exemption, and the online property tax bill that was again offered up by a conservative debator on this same blog).

Last night on H&C She told Alan Colmes that liberals stalking her will never find out where she lives and laughed about it. She's rich, she's smart, and she's successful! Did she stumble on it? Or did she have a plan?

I graduated college a few years ago with a Bach in Business with a minor in Political Science. I went to a standard University and worked hard to do so. If you did the same thing, think of how hard or challenging it was to remain focused on accomplishing that goal.

Next, think of Ann Coulter. Making her way through Cornell University, then off to Law School, passing both institutions in the top her classes and moving on to pass the bar. Top that with various other credentials that she has earned and examine the success of all of her books.

Someone this intelligent is going to be stupid enough to allow anyone to go on Yahoo and obtain her personal residence and telephone number (see for yourself if you don't believe me) so that two Florida elections officials can get their names in the paper and screw everything up that someone in her position has achieved. Now throw in the possibility that just maybe people like you are being played.

Honestly, if you cannot outwit conservatives in general, how can we trust your party with out-witting terrorism?

I'll take a pass on the meds - but sleep is definitely in my near future.

Thank you and goodnight!

And we claim to have killed al-zarqawi now.. news flash on FOX NEWS... lol..

How many times have we "killed important leaders" of terrorists?

And we say we've killed him, and note he's killed "thousands of civilians", yet they don't say "the U.S. has killed thousands of civilians too"..

more bushit, if you ask me.. and fox is touting it as "a major, major event for pResident Bush".. and at the same time say "nothing has changed, but look what we did!!!!"..

morons..

Also a newsflash by the associated press that will show up in the NYTimes in about 5 minutes.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/...re_mi_ea/iraq_al_zarqawi

Playing the Fox News card should be getting old for ya by now.

Al-Zarqawi was fictictious name made up by psy-ops

OT,.. sorta,... more gross hypocrisy by fascists ?

It seems Laura and gwb are having marital difficulties of some sort,.. infidelities,.. extramarital
affair between chimpy and Condi ?

Link : Laura/Chimpy/Condi Affair

Well the story may not be that simple,..

Mr. Hyper-Clean family - values fascist (gwb),..
maybe Mr. Hyper-Hypocrite - dirt-bag. Who makes
Bill Clinton look like a saint.

Chimpy's sex drive seems to be all over the map,..
going in multiple directions,.. all at one time.
What an appetite gwb has got,.. what a hypocrite !

Link : Chimpy's dalliances

The Protection of Marriage Act ?
More like,.. The Theatrical Act of the
Sanctimonious Hypocrit !!!

Heres what the dead Zarqawi story is trying to bury
Old Zarqawi is just an (paid ?) extremist from the city of Zarqa
Link
Pay attention

Psy-ops will have a new one to be scared of in about a week or so

I've got a #1 bestseller in the works:

"The Wit of Sean Hannity, The Charm of Bill O'Reilly, The Sex-Appeal of Ann Coulter, and other Right-Wing Fairy Tales"

"Today, Zarqa is also known as the birthplace and namesake of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, leader of the Tawhid and Jihad militant group, which, in November 2004, announced it had changed its name to al-Qaeda in Iraq."

Wasn't the name change just before the election, as I recall ?

These bastards will do anything to keep our tax money flowing into the "war machine"

Wiki Link

How many Terrorists were from Saudi Arabia ?
Did we bomb them?

This guy was from Jordan, did we bomb them ?

This is sick

Floridiot: Correct, I need to add an Al-Zarqawi chapter to my book. Thanks.

Also, TTP (I look at that and can't help wanting to add some letters, like shTTuP - kind of poetic, really), I will give you credit for this quip: "Honestly, if you cannot outwit conservatives in general, how can we trust your party with out-witting terrorism?" That IS pretty funny, on the surface. Unfortunately, wit has nothing to do with solutions to the present dilemmas facing our nation. If it was a matter of wit, well, conservatives are pretty well unarmed, aren't they? (Present company excepted - as I noted, that quip was a pretty decent zinger.) They're loaded to the hilt with ammo such as hate, fearmongering, wedge issues, pseudo-patriotism, etc., but I don't believe that wit is in their arsenal.

Wit:
The natural ability to perceive and understand; intelligence.

Keenness and quickness of perception or discernment; ingenuity. Often used in the plural: living by one's wits.
wits: Sound mental faculties; sanity: scared out of my wits.

The ability to perceive and express in an ingeniously humorous manner the relationship between seemingly incongruous or disparate things.
One noted for this ability, especially one skilled in repartee.
A person of exceptional intelligence.

Yup, I'm afraid that other than the rare individual (and maybe Coulter would satisfy one of these definitions) the right-wing is decidedly lacking in the wit department, regardless of which meaning you take.

I have to clarify one of my sentences above. I said "wit has nothing to do with solutions to the present dilemmas facing our nation." I did not mean to imply that we don't need "wit" to solve our nation's dilemmas, I meant to imply that wit is currently not being exercised or applied in any proposed solutions to those dilemmas by those who control everything in our government.

25.0 - Is it true president Fuck Face, that, once you go Black . . . . . You never don't go Back ? ? ?

I thought this thing was a lawyer? Nice goin'.

A good depiction of the "Distracter in Chief"

Link

A story with pictures of Zarqawi, for kids

http://judicial-inc/Zarqawi.htm

Can't make a link with this one, just copy and paste

add dot biz after -inc,

Quote from one of the captions

"Al Qaeda Is An Israeli Fabrication, Out Of Jordan"

this "woman" is such a nobody--and she deserves absolutely no attention at all. she's like the kid at someone else's birthday party--so jealous and obsessed with attention she keeps pulling her dress over her head. isn't it obvious? she uses photos that are from years ago on her website--
her kryptonite is our disinterest. just ignore her and she's melting like the witch did for Dorothy.

Off topic, but what the heck, you all do it too...

Breaking news

The leader is dead, but the organization lives on. Perhaps they will be demoralized, perhaps not. But in any way, this is still good news.

If you don't think this is good news, then you are not looking at the big picture for America's future.

Have a nice day! (I know I will!)

Come on. Coulter's publisher is Crown Publishing Group - a newly formed branch devoted entirely to conservative writers. Who else would publish this woman? Look for books soon from this publisher by Robt. Novak & Michael Medved. They appear to be following in the footsteps of Regnery Publishing - you know - the Publisher who relies on bulk buying from conservative organizations. These organizations purchase the books for next to nothing solely to quickly boost a book up to #1. Old trick. A con game.

Mike J #36

I saw that too. Some are calling him an al Queida terrorist and others are calling him leader of the insurrection.

I think he was al Queida and not an insurrectionist.

If he is such a big deal, as the regime here says he is, then it will show up as improving conditions there. If he has really had an effect, that effect should subside.

Sadaam's capture was touted to be almost equal to the second coming, yet things only got worse after his capture, imprisionment, and ongoing trial.

If it has no effect then it means little, except that it is good when a terrorist gets what is coming.

Just to be on topic: Ann Coulter is a hate slut elitist who thinks laws were made by god for other people ... she is lawless.

ALLLLLLLLLLLLL

ABOOOOOOOOOOOOARD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I guess the Iraq War is over, then, huh Mike J???

Brad,

You support criminals everday by ignoring them here. But they are democrats so you dont care how many laws they break.

ZARQAWI IS DEAD! I wonder how many of you kooks woke up to this news and were upset by it. You will never admit it, but you wanted him alive.

HUGE VICTORY FOR THE IRAQIS. CONGRATS TO THEM!

For Loretta: You've got it exactly right. I know Brad and others disagree, but we pay Ann Coulter way, way too much attention here. She's just as you describe her...a woman/child who craves attention and resorts to outrageous statements when she doesn't get it.

The more we focus on her, the more her narrow base of right-wing fanatics loves it. They buy her books and pay her $30,000 per speech because she serves as their mouthpiece. Her goal isn't to persuade or change minds, or to contribute to a debate, it's to rally the troops against people she and they hate, purely on a personal level.

It's fine to show documents that prove she violated election laws. It's fine to mention the phony homestead exemption. But it's not fine to get down in the gutter and argue with Ann Coulter. It's counter-productive. We have more important things to deal with. Coulter absolutely doesn't deserve the attention she craves, any more than a Louis Farrakhan or a David Duke does, and every minute we spend on her is time better spent on election fraud, impeachment, Iraq, etc.

ANNIE "GET YOUR GUN"GUCKERT-GANNON

The hatred of ann against others is caused by the tension of desiring to morph into jeffie and the hatred of jeffie is caused by the counter tension of jeffie longing to morph into ann. Hence the ANNjeffIE culture of hatred is born and the neoCon airheads just love the little beenie baby.

TTP (who wouldn't know T if it bit him in the A):

Ann Coulter is the right-wing version of Ward Churchill. Fox News trots out Ward Churchill every time they want to get a so-called liberal to make an outrageous statement that they can then attribute to all liberals. The difference is that liberals don't even know who Ward Churchill is, much less agree with him. But, the right absolutely worships Ann Coulter.

Talk about getting your undies in a bunch, what do you call it when the right goes berserk over Dick Durbin when he says that the scenes described by FBI agents in Guantanamo might be mistaken for a Soviet gulag or a Nazi concentration camp? 'You guys' had to twist it around quite a bit to make it sound like he was actually calling the marines at Gitmo Nazis. Or, how about the wicked spin they put on Murtha's comments, just so they could feign outrage over him 'calling all marines murderers', as if he had actually said that.

The thing about Coulter is that, unlike the people on the left that 'you guys' have to misquote, take out of context, or just flat-out fabricate statements from, we can quote her statements in context and in their entirety. What she says is exactly what she intended to say, no editing necessary.

She's a sick bitch who probably out to start adding staff for personal protection if she's still going to do book signings in New York. Those four wives weren't the only people who lost loved ones on 9/11. For someone who is so filled with hate, and who repeatedly advocates the murder of masses of innocent human beings and thinks it's all a big joke, to start touting herself as a Christian is about as far out there on the offensive scale as you can get. She might as well be taking a dump on a crucifix.

And 'you guys' think she's just wonderful. Thats why your chances of holding onto the House and Senate have steadily dropped from a safe bet to highly unlikely. It's all about you, the Republicans. And America hates you.

Hey Dredd, did you hear about a big explosion over in Iraq after Zarqawi got it ?, the MSM was talking about it earlier when I posted above, now it has disappeared
Maybe the same incident, who knows
Or it was an insurgent attack, but covered up to let Georgie have his day

Well, unmarried childless blowhard flipflopper Spinster Coulter-- where DO you live? Florida or New York?

Lawless Bush and you think you can do anything you want, anywhere you want . . . . bwa ha ha ha. See you in Gitmo, Skeletor Skank!

:laugh:

Alright Dredd - that's $19.95 for a new keyboard - I'll take cash or check only!

When the headline said "Reveals a Disturbing Medical Condition for BRAD BLOG Reporters!" I took it to mean she had some female problem which would destroy all of our conspiracy theories!

It probably should have read: "Reveals a Disturbing Medical Condition (of) BRAD BLOG Reporters!"

I think as long as the MSM gives hatemongers a forum, we have to have a forum to reverse it, not ignore it.

Ice to see you, Dredd...

Ann Coulter: The rightwingers' & MSM's icon of the Republicans.

They bash Michael Moore in the MSM, but he has a good heart & good intentions.

They parade Ann Coulter in the MSM, and give her a forum to spew hate and prejudice. Newpapers give her a column to spew hate and prejudice. CNN & FOX will let her talk uninterrupted and spew hate.

#44:

The difference between Ann Coulter and Ward Churchhill fundamentally is that Ward Churchhill makes over $100,000 from school funding and state funding. The only way Coulter makes money is by Republican organizations within the school that operate off of their own funding and makes it from book sales in the name of "free market." Of course Ann Coulter rakes in A LOT more than he does but that pretty much separates the two. If her sole income was derived from educational funding, then I could see your point.

Your statement about the right worshipping the ground she walks on or whatever your phraseology was on it; I'd have to say I disagree with. In fact; whenever possible, left-wingers like Arianna Huffington (when needed to attack Coulter) will point out how "even-Republicans" think Ann Coulter is appalling. In addition, fellow conservative Tucker Carlson and Bill O'Reilly think her latest statements were over the top, inappropriate, what have you.

Bill O'Reilly (and maybe Tucker Carlson though I don't think that anyone wastes their time watching MSNBC anymore thanks to the CNN & Fox) has a huge audience. Chances are more than none that a lot of conservatives think that she was over the top as well.

I guess we'll see how well the book does. I like Ann Coulter and do believe her tough statements FORCE dialogue to happen on certain issues. I think now because someone finally said it as tough and unrefined as possible, there can be some no-holds-barred discussion on the topic of these people and their personal tragedies being politicized.

The bright side for your side is: if Savanster is right by saying that the right has done the same thing then they can use this same newly created platform to expose the same thing and have the validity of those charges tested in the arena of true public opinion.

See a tongue-in-cheek visual depicting "The New War On Terror: Afgh-Ann-A-Skank"...here:

www.thoughttheater.com

Loretta & RLM,
You're right. I regret now that I even posted a comment about her.
btw, ignore ricky & mike j, too. They're delusional disinformation-robots & not worthy of attention.

Sorry ... BlueBear 2 ... I couldn't resist ...

Ice to see you Big Dan ...

Floridiot, This is like the old west where people are rejoicing in killing an outlaw.

Reminds me of what Gandhi said when asked "What do you think of western civilization?"

He replied, "It would be a good idea".

Many are already saying the killing of Zarqawi could make matters worse and generate revenge killings ... which will engender more killings ...

Not a good way to run a fresh "democracy" (link here).

Yes ... civilization would be a good thing ... better than the current debacle.

But A. Coulter would have to morph into what she is not ... and that is unlikely.

Now that we have her open admission of voter fraud, in not one, but 2 places, as well as tax credit fraud, it is the duty of every good liberal to perform a citizen's arrest at her next book signing and making sure she is put in jail and extradited to FL for trial

And pray she resists arrest

Like all Republicans, she is an inherent criminal and liar. Nothing is wrong as long as she gets what she wants.

#51 Just a couple things here.

Minor: In spite of Tucker, MSNBC primetime is improving in the ratings and has for the last few months, Same for CNN. At the same time, Fox primetime has been dropping. They've still got the larger share by far, but the trend is pretty clear.

"I like Ann Coulter and do believe her tough statements FORCE dialogue to happen on certain issues. I think now because someone finally said it as tough and unrefined as possible, there can be some no-holds-barred discussion on the topic of these people and their personal tragedies being politicized."

Well, that is quickly emerging as Coulter's greatest selling point, according to the right. She forces dialogue, along with 'she says exactly what's on her mind'.

I don't think we really need to hear exactly what's on her mind when it comes encased in language that is more characteristic of a sociopath than a political commentator. And that's the appeal she has for her audience. The 'bomb all these people' and 'poison that person' statements make her popular with what kind of person? Who is gratified by those mental images?

And, specifically about the 9/11 widows, the dialogue she's forcing obscures the fact that these women are trying to prevent what happened on 9/11 from happening again. Yes, they can speak about grief from personal experience and they'd like to keep others from having to go through what they did. Did they politicize their grief? No. The situation was politicized by the administration not wanting a 9/11 commission for fear that it might shed some light on their inattention to warnings about terrorists and their ineptitude with regard to national security. They placed CYA above learning from mistakes and trying to prevent more attacks. It was politicized by the fact that the White House and the Republicans who control Congress refuse to enact measures that were called for by the 9/11 commission. If the Democrats were not trying to get port security and chemical plant security bills passed and were, instead, ignoring the issue as the Republicans have, then maybe the widows would not have the appearance of having politicized their grief. But, when it appears to be a clearly partisan issue only by virtue of the Republicans' steadfast obstruction of preventive measures, the 9/11 widows saw it as their responsibility to point out where the resistance was coming from.

And for that, they're called "The Witches of East Brunswick"? What dialogue? Who's having a dialogue? It's one person spewing hatred, and spewing it on people who have already suffered a great loss. What next, Ann? Shall we go torment some Holocaust survivors and call them a bunch of whiny Zionists?

Ann reminds me of this hate filled preacher who used to show up every year at the University I went to. Brother Jeb absolutely reveled in all the insults that came his way because of his fascist reading of the bible in the quad area. Then I read later in the student paper that he said that he knows he is outrageous and that is his plan, because as students walk away saying "that guy is so wrong about God" then he has caused them to start having a dialog about religion in general and Christianity in particular. In his own sick way, this is how he was "bringing people to Christ", only it was obvious that anyone who would find Christ after a lecture from this guy whould be someone in need of psychiatric intervention.

I suspect that this is the model Coulter originally started with, but the money got so good and the need to continually shock is how the money keeps flowing so she has to really flog that beast harder and harder. Hence we have comments claiming that widows are "enjoying their husband's death".

If the righties posting here had any intellectual honesty they could see that it is reprehensible to say that people who watched over and over (hell, you couldn't avoid it) the video of their spouses being burned to death are now "enjoying " it . I wonder how many other people out there who had a loved one burned or crushed to death in the attacks are enjoying Ann's "enjoying their deaths" remarks? Carlson and O'Reilly saying it was over the top does not excuse her comments, and you can be sure that at the next big republican get together that as usual Ann's "lecture" will be the most well attended event, as it always it.

And, Coulter destroys her own argument, as do her supporters. Coulter is saying that the widows are using their position as widows to not allow anyone to criticism them. And yet when anyone criticizes her comments, we get the bloggy stormtroopers out there saying "you can't criticize Ann", but you can criticize the hell out the the 9-11 widows. So which is is boys, people are allowed to comment about the statements of public figures, or aren't they?

Of course it would be nice if there was some civility to the conversation, but civility doesn't sell Ann's books or get her audiences of keyboard commandos in a fit of rage. One look at a list of Coulter's quotes tells you that civility is not something she gives a rat's ass about. Her claiming to be a Christian after all her remarks filled with hate and who should be murdered (10 commandments anyone?) is just her needing to pander to another potential audience (the same one making video games for Christians where they get to kill liberals and nonbelievers - Jesus would be so proud!). And apparently another thing she doesn't give a rat's ass about is how many times she's registered to vote, tax fraud on the homestead exemption, or using her realtor's address to register to vote. Gee, that is some pretty heavy disregard for the rule of law and voting as the basis of democracy, but I wouldn't expect anything less from a uberpatriot llike Ann. She loves America so much she votes in 3 places!

"As long as there are redneck idiots in America, I'll keep writing." — Ann Coulter

SO HOW DO WE GET HER OFF THE AIRWAVES AND OUT OF THE PUBLISHING BUSINESS?

HOW CAN SOMEONE SO VILE BE PUBLISHING ANYTHING, LET ALONE HAVING PEOPLE READ IT?

This is a huge part of the problem in America, someone like this is put on TV and in print, unfortunately people will listen to the soundbites and be affected by her words.

Hatred is out there and will be stirred by someone like this. We must do whatever we can to discredit this evil woman.

There is a place for people like her and Limbaugh - a real or imagined HELL.