We’ve been updating this item all day and night — having started the earlier this afternoon — as events have developed…See bottom for latest updates through the EXPLOSION which has 3/12/11 1am PT.
We are now moving the UPDATES as of the EXPLOSION to a new item here…
This now deserves its own item — as I’ve feared it has since last night’s cryptic official comments — so I’ve broken off the UPDATES from the previous item, concerning the nuclear emergency declared at Fukushima in the wake of last night’s earthquake and tsunami in Japan to this item, dedicated to the nuke issues.
We asked, snarkily, at the end of the original item earlier today: “Nuclear Energy for America: What Could Possibly Go Wrong?”
We may be learning exactly that tonight, as radiation levels are reported to be 1000 times normal levels; “emergency” declarations now exist for two plants — Fukushima Daiichi plant on east coast, 200 miles north of Tokyo and the Fukushima Daiichi complex — with a total of five reactors said to be at risk; evacuations around the plants have been expanded to 10km; and, as one of the experts has said (and several others have concurred), “the possibility of some sort of core meltdown” exists.
If there was nothing to worry about here, it seems that officials would be saying that over and over. They are not.
So, the original UPDATES to the earlier item, and the additional ones we’ve added throughout the day, all follow below — with new UPDATES, and what seems to be the increasingly bad news, including two nuclear experts who have just appeared on Rachel Maddow moments ago saying the more they hear, the less assured they are that things are safe — all added to the bottom of the article, where we’ll continue to update as warranted.
We’re also continue to tweet quick updates and links via: @TheBradBlog.
UPDATE 12:41pm PT: More details here on the “Nuclear Crisis at Fukushima”. The article is already outdated, however, as the 2km evacuation has just now been expanded to 10km by the Japanese Prime Minister, according to tweets from VOA’s Asian Bureau Chief Steve Herman who adds: “Officials now saying radiation at Fukushima nuke plant 1,000X normal level.” (BBC report on levels.)
Herman adds Kyodo is reporting “This suggests radioactive steam could spread around the facility.”
Really not good.
UPDATE: 2:41pm PT: CNN has an update now, including an expert who says, “If they can’t restore power to the plant (and cool the reactor), then there’s the possibility of some sort of core meltdown.”
Key excerpts now follow below…
Citing the Tokyo Electric Power Co., Japan’s Kyodo News Agency said that radioactive substances may have seeped out of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear reactor, about 160 miles (260 kilometers) north of Tokyo. Earlier, the agency had reported that authorities may purposefully release radioactive vapor to alleviate pressure at the power plant.
Radiation levels measured at a monitoring post near the plant’s main gate are more than eight times above normal, Japan’s nuclear safety agency said, according to Kyodo.
…
Most of the concern has centered around the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear reactor, which Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano told reporters on Friday “remains at a high temperature” because it “cannot cool down.”
…
The company said that it plans to take steps to “reduce the pressure of the reactor.”
…
The government said earlier that it was sending senior officials and the defense force’s Chemical Corps to the Fukushima power plant, according to the Kyodo News Agency.
The same agency later reported that authorities may release some radioactive steam in order to alleviate pressure at the reactor.
The IAEA, the international nuclear organization, said Friday that its officials are “in full response mode,” as they worked with Japanese authorities and monitor the situation.
Using Air Force planes, the U.S. government has sent over coolant for the Fukushima plant, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Friday.
…
James Acton, a physicist who examined the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant after a 2007 earthquake, told CNN that Japanese authorities are in a race to cool down the Fukushima reactor.
“If they can’t restore power to the plant (and cool the reactor), then there’s the possibility of some sort of core meltdown,” he said.
UPDATE 5:41pm PT: Earlier today from LATimes…
The news doesn’t seem any better from USAToday late tonight…
The Japanese government on Friday declared a nuclear emergency at Tokyo Electric Power’s Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station after the reactor’s cooling system failed. The government ordered thousands of people living within 6 miles of the plant to evacuate. Early Saturday, it declared a nuclear emergency at a second power plant where a cooling system had also failed.
“It has the potential to be catastrophic,” said Robert Alvarez, a senior scholar at the Institute for Policy Studies in Washington, and a former senior policy adviser to the Energy Secretary during the Clinton administration.
…
Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano said the amount of radioactivity in vapor would be “very small” and would not harm people or the environment.
“With evacuation in place and the ocean-bound wind, we can ensure the safety,” he said at a news conference early Saturday.
The venting may relieve some pressure and give workers more time to restore the emergency cooling systems. They have a 12- to 24-hour window, Alvarez said.
“I don’t think the venting is going to result in a catastrophic release, but it’s definitely an indication that all is not well there,” he said.
If the cooling is not restored quickly, the core can overheat, causing the water to boil over and exposing the core to air. The interior can catch fire and cause a meltdown, releasing nuclear material into the concrete containment dome that surrounds the reactor, Alvarez says.
“Is this barrier going to be sufficient?” Alvarez said. “It’s a dicey proposition. The best you can say is, stay tuned.”
If they re-establish a stable power supply and restore the cooling, “We should all breathe a sigh of relief,” Alvarez said. “If they can’t, it’s very serious.”
5:58pm PT: From AP…
Operators at the Fukushima Daiichi plant’s Unit 1 scrambled ferociously to tamp down heat and pressure inside the reactor after the 8.9 magnitude quake and the tsunami that followed cut off electricity to the site and disabled emergency generators, knocking out the main cooling system.
Some 3,000 people within two miles (three kilometers) of the plant were urged to leave their homes, but the evacuation zone was more than tripled to 6.2 miles (10 kilometers) after authorities detected eight times the normal radiation levels outside the facility and 1,000 times normal inside Unit 1’s control room.
The government declared a state of emergency at the Daiichi unit – the first at a nuclear plant in Japan’s history. But hours later, the Tokyo Electric Power Co., which operates the six-reactor Daiichi site, announced that it had lost cooling ability at a second reactor there and three units at its nearby Fukushima Daini site.
The government quickly declared states of emergency for those units, too, and thousands of residents near Fukushima Daini also were told to leave.
…
Despite plans for the intentional release of radioactivity, Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano said the 40-year-old plant was not leaking radiation.
“With evacuation in place and the ocean-bound wind, we can ensure the safety,” Edano said at a televised news conference early Saturday.
It was unclear if the elevation of radioactivity around the reactor was known at the time he spoke.
…
Dr. Irwin Redlener, a pediatrician who runs a disaster preparedness institute at Columbia University, said the reported level of radiation outside the plant would not pose an immediate danger, though it could lift the rate of thyroid cancer in a population over time.
However, he called the reported level inside the plant extraordinarily high, raising a concern about acute health effects. “I would personally absolutely not want to be inside,” he said.
…
Technical experts said the plant would presumably have hours, but probably not days, to try to stabilize things.
…
It also was not immediately clear how closely the reactor had moved toward dangerous pressure or temperature levels. If temperatures were to keep rising to more than 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit, it could set off a chemical reaction that begins to embrittle the metallic zirconium that sheathes the radioactive uranium fuel.
That reaction releases hydrogen, which can explode when cooling water finally floods back into the reactor. That was also concern for a time during the 1979 Three Mile Island accident in Pennsylvania.
If the reactor temperature keeps reaches around 4,000 degrees, the fuel could melt outright, and the reactor could slump right into the bottom of the containment building in a partial meltdown. Then the crucial question would be whether the building would stay intact.
“The last line of defense is that containment – and that’s got to hold,” Gundersen said. If it doesn’t, the radioactive load inside the reactor can pour out into the surroundings.
…
As one of the most seismically active countries in the world, Japan has strict sets of regulations designed to limit the impact of quakes on nuclear power plants. These standards call for building plants on solid bedrock to reduce shaking.
Even so, 10 of Japan’s 54 commercial reactors were shut down because of the quake, and Tokyo Electric Power said it had to reduce power generation. Japan gets about 30 percent of its electricity from nuclear power.
One, perhaps, “positive” point in the AP article: “Mobile electricity supplies” have arrived at the Daiichi plant. Electricity, they say, it’s what’s needed now to cool down the reactors, presuming it’s not too late.
And on Rachel Maddow just now, an expert concurred that he is feeling less good about the situation, the more that he is hearing about it…
6:42pm PT: Another expert on Maddow, Joe Cirincione of Ploughshares Fund, says: “We have never seen something like this. We have never seen multiple reactors at risk. … This could be a technological catastrophe.”
7:23pm PT: Reuters via Twitter: “FLASH: Japan PM says minute amounts of radiation released from Fukushima plant: Kyodo” — “Minute”, eh?…
7:31pm PT: Washington Post confirms “state of emergency…for five nuclear reactors at two quake-struck power plants as military and utility officials scrambled to tame rising pressure and radioactivity levels inside the units and stabilize the facilities used to cool the plants’ hot reactor cores.”
They also present some conflicting info to previous reports of restored electricity: “The utility said it had restored power from the grid, but the IAEA said power was restored from ‘mobile electricity supplies.'”
Doesn’t instill confidence, frankly.
7:55pm PT: Leak confirmed. Story posted at CNN minutes ago…
Atomic material has seeped out of one of the Fukushima Daiichi plant’s five nuclear reactors, about 160 miles (260 kilometers) north of Tokyo, said Kazuo Kodama, a spokesman for Japan’s nuclear regulatory agency.
9:07pm PT: Most recent announcement from IAEA on Fukushima is now 7 hours old. No newer news on 5 nuclear reactor emergencies, IAEA???
9:21pm PT: Oy. Reuters via Twitter: “FLASH: #Japan nuclear authorities say high possibility of meltdown at Fukushima Daiichi No. 1 reactor – Jiji”
9:31pm PT: AP’s Tomoko Hosaka confirms: “Japan nuclear safety commission official says meltdown at nuclear power plant possible”
9:37pm PT: Looks like it’s either about to meltdown, or already is doing so…
TimeOutTokyo from Kyodo: “Reports coming in: cesium detected around the nuclear reactor 1 (Fukushima), which is one of the elements that gets released in a meltdown”
Asia editor of The Times, Richard Lloyd Parry via Twitter:: “Nuclear expert tells The Times: meltdown has technically begun at Fukushima.” … “Fukushima fel cores are melting at 2000C and dropping onto steel floor. Steel melts at 1500C. Could still be brought under control, but … Four other Fukushima nuke reactors are struggling with similar problem. If multiple meltdown begins, it will be uncontrollable.”
9:47pm PT: More from The Times editor’s Twitter feed: “Japan faces serious chance of nuclear disaster to rival Three Mile Island. At least, J nuke program is set back years, possibly scuttled.” … “If there is full scale Fukushima meltdown current evac zone 10km is inadequate. 30km at least needed.”
VOA’s Steve Herman has somewhat (?) conflicting report from AP: “AP quotes experts saying if nuke meltdown, risk zone is 6km radius.”
9:53pm PT: From bad to worse, it looks like. This from NHK World (via Rachel Maddow):
The operation at Fukushima No.1 plant to lower pressure of the containment vessel has been suspended due to high radiation levels at the site.
Pressure of the reactor container is rising as its cooling system became dysfunctional due to a blackout and power generator breakdown. This has raised concern about possible damage to the container.
The power station’s operator, Tokyo Electric Power Company, began to vent air from the reactor container at 9AM on Saturday.
Under the plan, 2 valves close to the container would be opened manually, but radiation level on the second valve was found higher than expected.
The operation has been suspended because of the possibility that workers could be exposed to radiation. The utility is reportedly studying how to open the valve by replacing workers at a short interval, or using electric remote control.
The Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency says if radioactive substance is released in the air, safety of residents evacuated beyond a 10-kilometer radius from the No.1 reactor will be ensured.
Saturday, March 12, 2011 13:09 +0900 (JST)
10:01pm PT: Some not as bad news? Richard Lloyd Parry of The Times again: “Another expert on NHK counsels caution, says Fukushima partial nuke meltdown is controllable, current evacuation zone is adequate.”
REMINDER: I’m able to cover more, quickly via Twitter. Follow here if you wish: @TheBradBlog.
10:21pm PT: From NBC…
Ryohei Shiomi said Saturday that officials were checking whether a meltdown had taken place at the Fukushima Daiichi power plant, which had lost cooling ability in the aftermath of Friday’s powerful earthquake.
Shiomi said that even if there was a meltdown, it wouldn’t affect humans outside a six-mile (10-kilometer) radius.
10:46pm PT: IAEA finally offers fresh update. First in eight hours or so. Not much new info there, however, it seems.
11:00pm PT: Meltdown politics. As the discussion has come up in comments here, Reuters just in with this: “Analysis: Nuclear power growth at risk if Japan plant leaks”
11:26pm PT: CNN reports on air: “Japanese nuclear power spokesman says small amount of cesium leaked into air around plant. Strong possibility it was caused by the melting of a fuel rod.”
11:34pm PT: Must stand down for the night (though may be able to tweet a bit longer at @TheBradBlog). Recommend you follow Steve Herman (@W7VOA), Voice of America’s Asian editor, whose just landed at Fukushima. He should have key reports from on the ground there.
We’ll be back as soon as possible…hopefully after some sleep. Stay safe, Japan.
* * * EXPLOSION * * *
* * *
UPDATE: 3/12 2:58am PT: As of the EXPLOSION, we are moving all new UPDATES to this new item…
Japanese dependence on oil made it vulnerable when Uncle Sam turned off the spigot.
Subsequent to that, there was Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
In order to be less dependent on foreign oil, Japan powers using the energy source of H&N.
Energy source used at H&N is vulnerable to Mother Nature.
The latest info I have as of 10:30 pm est is that the worst problem at the Japan nuclear plants is a “Station Blackout” at a Boiling Water Reactor (BWR). I have no desire to profit form this disaster, but I’d like ot point out this the key event of my novel Rad Decision is a Station Blackout at a BWR. The novel is available free at http://RadDecision.blogspot.com and it may help provide some perspective. I’ve worked in the US nuclear industry for many years. Jim Aach
In short: Fission plants run very, very hot and even when the reactor is shut down it takes time for the cooling system to bring the core temp down.
The quake hit. The reactors (all of them) shut down exactly as designed. The plants stopped receiving power from the grid and the emergency generators were to take over…
… but the emergency generators were taken out somewhere amidst the quake, tsunami, aftershocks, the second quake and it’s aftershocks…
Thus the cooling systems were left with battery power and “manual” methods.
Oops.
Id like to know who had the idea to build nuclear plants in an earthquake zone!?! or do the builders boast that they can design plants that are quake proof? Clearly this tsunami shows they are not safe.
AND what if 7.9 quake takes place right under them?
The snarky can rest assured that this incident will make the public think twice about nuke plants in their back yard…and in a democracy thatd be enought to prevent any more being built..but we dont live in democracies..
History shows again and again
How nature points up the folly of man
-blue oyster cult
… brian asked…
We all live in an earthquake zone.
And fission plants are all that the oiligarchs will permit.
MORAL: nukes are dangerous whether as weapons or power plants/..Only a fool would build more plants esp in quake zones…is Iran paying attention?
will the proponents of nuclear power as a safe alternative to coal, now dig a deeper pit to stick their heads in?
And nuke proponents would correctly point out your persistence in overgeneralizing almost to the point of demagoguery.
Unfortunately the nuke proponents are themselves limited by the oiligarchs control of energy and their royal fiat that only meltdown-prone, bomb-capable uranium fission plants can be built.
Even so the Japanese plants in question are dated and there are current uranium-fueled designs that would have avoided this particular catastrophe.
But new nuke plants are very expensive and that’s not because of the “greenies” per se… they are expensive because that’s the way the oligarchs like it.
Speaking of Zap & Brian’s discussion, just in from Reuters: “Analysis: Nuclear power growth at risk if Japan plant leaks”
Brad, I was a ‘youn’un’ in Pennsylvania during the Three Mile Island fiasco… although I was in Pittsburgh, nearly 200 miles from TMI, I distinctly remember an ‘expert’ on one of our local radio talk shows saying that at 200 miles even if the reactor melted down we were probably safe for now.
It was terrifying, and I am sure it would be even more so in an island nation with limited evacuation capacity.
I get the exact same feelings here, Marybeth. I sense the authorities are really trying to downplay what may be going on here.
No great evidence for that, other than the last 24 hours of statements that are contradicted by later info, as the situation seems to be getting worse, even as the warnings of where we are now were not really given previously…
Any of that make sense?
… Brad asked…
Of course not but some grim amusement can be derived by conidering that situation’s eerie resemblance to the debacle of the climate change “debate.”
The first time Japan was nuked was Hiroshima and Nagasaki and it was done by the USA.
This time it may be at their own hands, as apparently they learned nothing the first time.
I hope that if worst comes to worst, any surviving Japanese nuclear execs will forego falling on their swords and instead take their swords and go kill nuclear execs in other countries to redeem their honor and save the rest of us.
My local Congresscritter says that we should all be prepared for disasters. I replied that we do need to be prepared for disasters because government deregulation won’t allow us to prevent disasters.
If you don’t have access to potassium iodide pills, a drop or two or regular iodine, the kind used to disinfect minor cuts and scrapes, in a glass of water will also work.
Predatory capitalism believes that killing a few million people here and there for short term profit is a legitimate business plan and, in Madeleine Albright’s words, they think it is worth it.
The US government has been stripping Bradley Manning naked in what they claim is a need to protect his privacy. Everything else the US government does is equally logical. To liberate villages, they have to destroy them. To ensure our safety, they have to kill us.
There have been calls in Wisconsin and elsewhere for a general strike. Of course the oligarchy gets their foie gras from France, their caviar from Russia, their Congo blood diamonds from Israel, and there is so little manufacturing and so few workers left in the US, mostly low-paid service workers, that if there was a total general strike here now, our oligarchy might not even notice it.
for our rulers, whats more important, our lives and well being or their economies and profits?
and Zak we are not all in earthquake zones. Australia where i live has few quakes if any.
This disaster should be used by Greenpeace and othes to press for an end to nuclear power
… brian said…
I’d assume that was a rhetorical question but even so there seems to be a badly mistaken assumption lurking in there: our lords and masters could not care less about “economies.”
They are so obscenely rich that the ups and downs of lesser beings simply do not concern them… at all.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li...s_in_Australia
… and the oligarchs will quietly funnel considerable funding to them for that purpose.
So what forms of nuclear power will you end… and when?
And what will you replace it with… and when? You must act quickly as millions of lesser beings depend upon nuclear energy.
FYI:
‘SINGAPORE, March 12 (Reuters) – The company at the centre of a nuclear reactor crisis following the biggest earthquake in Japan’s recorded history has had a rocky past in an industry plagued by scandal. ‘
etc
http://af.reuters.com/article/e...7EC07P20110312
zac….your wiki takes me to apage that says MOST of the aussie quakes take place in the ocean!LOL
i felt a quake when working in darwin, and once in my home towh, small tremor…thats it.
Australia is located inside a plate,so quake are rare. And as your wiki says NO big ones.
an end to all forms
Australias ha one one reactor: Lucau Heights. for medical research ets
@Brad re tweets: “containment” has a specific meaning that is not the same as “container.”
Various media coverage seems to use both terms interchangably, Zap.
Have moved all updates as of the EXPLOSION to a new item now here…
… brian said…
Hmmm… ocean… earthquake… where have I heard that combination before?
Hmmm? Ignoring the quakes epicentered in the water… which worries me for some reason that I can’t quite put my paw on… I don’t think it’s setting the bar too high to worry about quakes rated as “strong” or better. Magnitude 6 or worse can certainly damage buildings etc… and there have been 9 onshore quakes of 6.0 or more since measurements began. Admittedly not so many compared to elsewhere… and that’s where your argument falls apart.
You see, you don’t build according to the worst that has happened in your lifetime, you build to the worst you can expect to happen in a certain time frame… or as least as much so as the records and science can predict and the budget will allow.
The quake that hit Japan was a once-in-a-millennium quake for that area. They haven’t been keeping written records for that long in that area.
… of nuclear power? How soon? And replaced with what?
And would you ban thorium reactors? Fusion reactors? These are not hypothetical questions anymore.
In Sydney, yes? From the name I’d hope it’s well above beach level?
I used unclear phrasing in my comment #20
The quake that hit Japan was a once-in-a-millennium quake for that area. They haven’t been keeping written records for that long in Australia.
‘The quake that hit Japan was a once-in-a-millennium quake for that area. They haven’t been keeping written records for that long in that area.’
a what? This is the rim of fire..and the recent wave of quakes tells us we wont have to waiot for a millenium for another
as for your thorium and fusion reactors..thanks i want none of the above. We dont need them and the earth cant afford them….They are part of the hi-tech cult.
The core melt has already occurred. It is now about containment and that may be lost soon. I am in this line of work and have been piecing together all the information and video. If this was a hydrogen explosion like one report said. It means the zirc-water reaction has already occurred. Fuel cladding material when it melts reacts to produce hydrogen. This is an exothermic reaction that produces even more heat than the decay heat. This is what happens during a core melt. The report I heard mentioned that it was the outer containment that exploded. That means the hydrogen has leaked past the primary containment structure and reached its explosive range in the secondary containment. All that was necessary was a spark. Hopefully the thicker primary containment building is intact and will hold most of the core material now called corium (molten core mass). Containment pressure is probably high and is being released to prevent primary containment breach. This is accounting for the increased radiation around the plant. Melt has occurred just keeping it contained now.
LLL –
See the 4:46 UPDATE on the new item, where the spokesman for the PM says:
Does that change your assessment in anyway? Also, the update just before that one:
If true, that goes against your “increased radiation around plant” comment. Change anything?
+++ Unbelievable scenes +++
There is now fire rising near Fukushima’s nuclear power plant! A disaster is expected to escalate soon.
http://bit.ly/gAuxRm
People running hectic through the cities. The Tokyo Int. airport is flooded with people want to leave Japan right now.
http://bit.ly/fd1duk
Officials still doubt whether nuclear radiation will destroy the whole area.
http://bit.ly/fU4KRO
Note re ken @ #25: the links are actually spam.